| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
ickysdad |
North Carolina/SoDak verse Littorio. |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 2685 (30-Aug-2007 07:07:13) |
We did a Iowa verse Vanguard here so why not those 2 USN BB's verse the Italian BB?
|
||
Ed |
|||
|
Posts: 2179 ( 2-Sep-2007 18:46:48) |
This really should be on the BB vs. BB board. But, to answer your question, either the NC class or the SoDak class BBs could easily handle the VV class BB.
|
||
Red Admiral |
|||
|
Posts: 1692 ( 2-Sep-2007 23:08:45) |
Ed wrote: Presumably because they are products of the US of A?
|
||
Ed |
|||
|
Posts: 2181 ( 2-Sep-2007 23:12:07) |
Presumably because they are products of the US of A?
No, the two USN BB classes did not have the problems with their 16"/45s that the Italians had with their 15"/50s. The USN also had radar controled FCS, and very good armor (well at least on the SoDaks). But the Italian BBs were faster. |
||
Red Admiral |
|||
|
Posts: 1693 ( 2-Sep-2007 23:43:23) |
Ed wrote: What problems with the 381/50s? The Littorios have equal or better firepower, considerably superior armour and are faster. They also have radar controlled
FC. For the years actually in service 1940-43, the Littorios are the better ships.
|
||
Ed |
|||
|
Posts: 2182 ( 3-Sep-2007 16:51:51) |
Their guns had wide dispersion problems. They couldn't hit the broadside of a battleship at range. Yes, they fired a heavier shell than most 15" guns,
and had a higher MV, but also had a much higher wear problem. Their armor was superior to NC's armor, but not to the SoDak's armor. Their radar
wasn't very good.
They could not stand up to the USN 16" 2700lb AP superheavy Mk.8 shells. They couldn't even stand up to the standard USN 16" AP shells (Mk.5 2240lb). The USN 16"/45 Mk.6 gun also out-ranged the Italian 15"/50 gun, although I believe the US gun had a lower MV. Just what did the Littorios do in their 3 years of service? They never left the Med. They did NOTHING, and were about as useful as the Yamatos were. Roma was sunk when they (all of the VV class) were steaming to surrender to the Allies, mostly because of poor damage control (she was on fire for some 45 minutes after the German missile hit, before her magazine blew up). |
||
Red Admiral |
|||
|
Posts: 1696 ( 3-Sep-2007 19:50:07) |
Their guns had wide dispersion problems.Please quantify this They couldn't hit the broadside of a battleship at range.Strange that they managed to hit destroyers and cruisers repeatedly at ranges over 20.000m. P.S. a destroyer is smaller than a battleship but also had a much higher wearWhich isn't a problem when you've developed loose liners to enable to to change over in less than 24 hours (as opposed to days) Their armor was superior to NC's armor, but not to the SoDak's armor.This statement is very, very wrong. Go and have a look at the Ideal Treaty BB thread on the BB vs. BB board to get penetration figures. Their radar wasn't very good.It was as good as the radar fielded on the US ships in the same time period. They could not stand up to the USN 16" 2700lb AP superheavy Mk.8 shells. They couldn't even stand up to the standard USN 16" AP shells (Mk.5 2240lb).Please quantify this bizarre statement. Please note that 46,807 is a [much] bigger number than 36,900 |
||
ickysdad |
|||
|
Posts: 2702 ( 4-Sep-2007 06:24:12) |
Red Admiral wrote: Well actually I think I put up a pretty good argument to P3D's IZ calculations on what kind of IZ NC or SoDak would have against Littorio's guns. It also seems funny that range is a big issue if a contemporaries guns outrange a USN BB in these kind of arguments but when it's brought up about superior USN radar/FC it's then announced that no hit was made historically beyond 25-26K therefore impossible. I'm not saying you Red Admiral but some people have came out & said no hit could be made past 25-26K then turn right around and say Yamato could pound two standards into trash before even coming within range of thier guns though standards could definately shoot farther then 25-26K. Actually I think not too many hits are going to be scored past 30K but be that as it may NC's & SoDak's decks are prettty much safe from Littorio's at any concievable range while you can't say that about Littorio's decks. As far as belts go well I posted something to the effect that Bismarck's guns could only achieve PP at around 24K verse NC with EFF penetration at about 21K and it seems from the tables Bismarck's guns do have a 3-4K disadvantage against Littorio's guns verse the same amount of armor so it seems to me that the inner edge of NC's immune zone to Littorio's guns is around 24-25K for EFF her decks safe till about 32-33K. SoDak's decks are even safer while her belt IZ probably could be moved in to around the 20K range . The same tables I used also understate the piercing ability of US shells. I seem to remember once before this being discussed(NC verse Littorio) and Tiornu made the comment that NC's sloped belt would present an extreme test to the proof angles of any shell. |
||
P3D |
|||
|
Posts: 472 ( 4-Sep-2007 08:32:07) |
Well actually I think I put up a pretty good argument to P3D's IZ calculations on what kind of IZ NC or SoDak would have against Littorio's guns.I missed to spot these arguments, especially regarding NC. You were quoting your memory, and I assume you might just mixed up some numbers. Claiming authority of other posters won't convince anyone, I would argue with them too if they'd present such data again. It also seems funny that range is a big issue if a contemporaries guns outrange a USN BB in these kind of arguments but when it's brought up about superior USN radar/FC it's then announced that no hit was made historically beyond 25-26K therefore impossible. I'm not saying you Red Admiral but some people have came out & said no hit could be made past 25-26K then turn right around and say Yamato could pound two standards into trash before even coming within range of thier guns though standards could definately shoot farther then 25-26K. Actually I think not too many hits are going to be scored past 30K but be that as it may NC's & SoDak's decks are prettty much safe from Littorio's at any concievable range while you can't say that about Littorio's decks.Ah, I understand. The USN is the one and only navy that can score any hit over 30K, as it demonstrated repeatedly during the war. And the chance to hit magically drops to zero after the distance is past 36K, and that this is hardly an importance. Even if a ship could spend its whole magazine keeping at 37K, and if no hits scored from the fired 600 shells then withdraw using its superior speed, and not allowing the SoDak to close. Even if chances are only half percent, that's three hits. Also SoDak, as mentioned by zillion times before, was laid down 5 years after Littorio, so the comparison is almost as valid as comparing Littorio to the Iowa or Colorado. As far as belts go well I posted something to the effect that Bismarck's guns could only achieve PP at around 24K verse NC with EFF penetration at about 21K and it seems from the tables Bismarck's guns do have a 3-4K disadvantage against Littorio's guns verse the same amount of armor so it seems to me that the inner edge of NC's immune zone to Littorio's guns is around 24-25K for EFF her decks safe till about 32-33K. SoDak's decks are even safer while her belt IZ probably could be moved in to around the 20K range.Ickysdad, you cannot translate 3-4K disadvantage at specific circumstances to 3-4Kdisadvantage at another specific circumstance. To avoid this, it is usally better to recalculate everything. That gives NoCal a dismal inner edge of an IZ. Being able to get penetrated at distances where the longest documented hits were recorded, and having no immune zone on the turret face is a bad thing, especially if the ship cannot make more than 23 knots without damaging her own FC apparatus and radar with excessive vibration. The same tables I used also understate the piercing ability of US shells. I seem to remember once before this being discussed(NC verse Littorio) and Tiornu made the comment that NC's sloped belt would present an extreme test to the proof angles of any shell.And the same tables can underestimate the piercing capabilities of other shells, like the Germans (by a large margin), so why not the Italian ones? The only oddball here are the Brits, but their shells usually had an extreme amount of explosive filling so it is not a big surprise if their AP shells are a bit weaker penetrators (the 14" RN shell had larger bursting charge than the 2700lbs superheavies). And that there's no data does not suggest that the Italian proof angles were bad, it's simply no data. |
||
Red Admiral |
|||
|
Posts: 1698 ( 4-Sep-2007 11:51:25) |
ickysdad wrote:It also seems funny that range is a big issue if a contemporaries guns outrange a USN BB in these kind of arguments but when it's brought up about superior USN radar/FC it's then announced that no hit was made historically beyond 25-26K therefore impossible. I'm not saying you Red Admiral but some people have came out & said no hit could be made past 25-26K then turn right around and say Yamato could pound two standards into trash before even coming within range of thier guns though standards could definately shoot farther then 25-26K. I wouldn't bet on any hits outside of 200 - 250hm without either spotting aircraft or late war radar FC as this range represents the visible horizon from about 30m altitude. IIRC, the early radar sets were able to report large calibre shell splashes out to 20.000yds with the late war centimetric sets out to 40.000yds or so. Unless its a proper line of battle situation spotting aircraft aren't going to be used, and weren't. It wouldn't be probable to hit at above this range because 1. you can't see that far and 2. the statistical improbability of hitting at such a range. I'll have a play with firing shells at North Carolina's armourscheme when I get home. |
||
ickysdad |
|||
|
Posts: 2703 ( 4-Sep-2007 14:19:17) |
P3D, 1. I did put up some numbers figuring what Bismarck's guns would penetrate at a certain range compared to Littorio's on thread "ideal treaty BB". I also stated I maybe wrong in one of my posts which is more then some people around here and no I'm not implying you or Red Admiral. 2. On range no I'm not saying the good ole USN magically hits at longer ranges compared to other navies. Though two USN BB's straddled a fast moving
,manuvering DD at 34 & 39K . I was pointing out the hypocracy of saying it's impossible for the USN to do it even when using late war FC but those same
people saying Yamato can do it using far less capable radar/FC . I also didn't say the chance of hits drop to 0 at 36K now did I ? I do agree the Italian
Navy was pretty good at long range too. If I'm not long the Italian navy preferred shooting at long range didn't they? And long range fire certainly
favors the US armor schemes pursuant to guns vereses deck armor doesn't it? The US ships in this regard are certainly superior past the 25K realm.
4.No those tables don't underestimate other navies shells(at least as it reads it doesn't) go read the table's introduction it's provides an
explanation of the underrating of US shells. Those tables were written(and all the calculations done ) by Nathan Okun & Mr. Rundgren ,pretty good company
there. As far as proof angles well Tiornu mentioned something about them in a thread on this same subject so ask him.
Last Edited By: ickysdad
4-Sep-2007 14:27:06.
Edited 2 times.
|
||