Perphaps a comparison of the SS Oyashio´s performance with regional competitors.
Also some insights of the prospects of a SSN serving in the future for the JMSDF could be a possibility??
Thanks,
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
rinti |
Is the JMSDF SS Oyashio class SSK´s an indegeneous design?? |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 2 (29-Jan-2004 07:32:26) |
Hi, reading the posts about the news of RoK building in a near future a SSN y wanted to know the overall quality of JMSDF SSk´s and specifically about the latest SS Oyashio class SSk´s.
Perphaps a comparison of the SS Oyashio´s performance with regional competitors. Also some insights of the prospects of a SSN serving in the future for the JMSDF could be a possibility?? Thanks, |
||
taschoene |
Re: Is the JMSDF SS Oyashio class SSK´s an indegeneous desig | ||
|
Posts: 4231 (29-Jan-2004 07:57:19) |
Yes, it is indigenous. I beleive all of the JMSDF's sub designs have been indigneous, though the Hayashios (early 60s) were modeled losely after the US Baracuda (K-1) class.
The JMSDF's submarine force is easily the most capable in the region, with large numbers of subs replaced at a very rapid rate. (in 2003, the oldest of the JMSDF's 15 combat subs was only 14 years old, and they had two dedicated training boats only 3 and 10 years old, respectively) Their subs seem quite capable, though one hears very little about their operations. I think nuclear power for the JMSDF is nearly imposible for the forseable future. One only has to see the massive protests that occur when a US nuclear-powered ship enters port to realize the obstacles it would face. |
||
Glen Levick |
Re: Is the JMSDF SS Oyashio class SSK´s an indegeneous desig | ||
|
Posts: 404 (29-Jan-2004 11:05:01) |
American tear-drop hull design influence (from the BARBEL-class) went into the seven modern UZUSHIO-class, commisioned from 1971~78. But the design was domestic. Each following class has essentially been a development and improvement on the former. Keeping things new and updated is very much the way the Japanese people are, and it's no surprise to me to see this occuring in their naval ship building and procurement programs.
On paper, the Japanese SSKs are very capable boats, but as mentioned earlier, we don't hear much about their operations. It is reasonable to assume however that they do get around, at least patrol beyond their own EEZ possibly at times. The new OYASHIO-class especially, is very much an ocean-going type with good endurance. For more on the sub classes and the JMSDF itself try here. Regards, Glenn.
------------------------------------ Visit the Basement Forum - for discussion on war, politics, technology, and more. "Nothing more disappointing to me to see a beautiful woman strike up and start smoking. What a waste.." - A Personal veiw |
||
koxinga888 |
Re: Is the JMSDF SS Oyashio class SSK´s an indegeneous desig | ||
|
Posts: 148 (23-Feb-2004 14:48:36) |
does Japan have any research on AIP technology? If so, is it Stirling or MESMA type close cycle engines?
JMSDF boats sounds formitable. But how does it compare to say a Type 212 or a Scorpene? Second, do they send their officers for something like the Perisher course? |
||
Glen Levick |
Re: Is the JMSDF SS Oyashio class SSK´s an indegeneous desig | ||
|
Posts: 404 (23-Feb-2004 17:46:58) |
A Sterling engine has been fitted to one of the HARUSHIO-class SSKs (Asashio in this case) for trials.
Regards, Glenn.
------------------------------------ ![]() Super Bowl XXXVIII Champions - The New England Patriots! |
||
Per Nordenberg |
|||
|
Posts: 724 (29-Jan-2008 16:53:29) |
Glen Levick wrote:
Last Edited By: Per Nordenberg
29-Jan-2008 17:01:43.
Edited 3 times.
|
||
Per Nordenberg |
|||
|
Posts: 725 (29-Jan-2008 17:50:19) |
I managed to find a couple of larger photos of the new Soryu:
Last Edited By: Per Nordenberg
29-Jan-2008 17:53:49.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
Alexius55 |
|||
|
Posts: 227 (29-Jan-2008 20:33:58) |
Per Nordenberg wrote: |
||
Sargon |
|||
|
Posts: 215 (30-Jan-2008 20:49:18) Rice Boss |
The JMSDF certainly has a potent force of SSKs...fast, quiet and well suited to the missions expected of them...a major asset in it's capabilties that it
is increasing in various areas. Still, there are interesting developments in the region as a whole, especially when one looks at naval planning in Korea and
China. It's certainly a fascinating part of the globe for naval development these days.
Sargon |
||
caioduilio |
|||
|
Posts: 39 (30-Jan-2008 23:26:34) |
mmmmh...
I imagine that japan should be state of art about design and manufacturing of fuel cells. But they have chosen to buy swedish stirling engines. AFAIK fuel cells should be much better for AIP on submarines. Stirling engines should be a bit more noisy! But japan has bought stirling engines... Any comment on this? |
||
Per Nordenberg |
|||
|
Posts: 726 (31-Jan-2008 01:11:06) |
caioduilio wrote: Kockums' Stirling AIP system is less costly than fuel cells. I think you could get 3 Gotland boats for the price of one of the new German U31 boats,
but then again Gotland is of course an older boat. Kockums AIP system is also a more mature system having operated successfully since 1988 (then onboard HMS
Näcken). Perhaps focus was on cost reduction and reliability for Japan. Stirling engines are also very quiet and vibrationfree.
Last Edited By: Per Nordenberg
31-Jan-2008 17:56:17.
Edited 1 times.
|
||