Yuku free message boards

---

OSCSSW wrote:

---

  It is YOU who "have absolutely zero knowledge of what you write". Since they are "insurgencies", then what they were/are to conquer were/are NOT " their neighbors" but their OWN domestic regimes that they did/do NOT agree with.

Take my advice and grow some grey matter so that you won't contradict yourself in the same post, at least.

That statement proves to me, atleast on this yop[ic you are utterly clueless.

Global Bullyman eh?  Pardon me while I fall down laughing! 

Beating the ever loving crap out of "Bullies" is not much of accomplishment, if you get them alone. 
I learned that in the first grade and it has held true ever since. 
The gutless cowards are only a problem for smaller and/or younger children.  Even then,  the cowards
travel in packs/gangs of other gutless scum. 
I'm sure your choice of handle subconsciously reflects what you are.  Pathetic

I will give you a bit of good advice.  Keep a civil tone in your posts to me.
I have no problem with disagreements but I will not stand for insults, especially from
a CCP stooge spouting the party line of a genocidal slave state.  

Now that we understand each other here is a bit of history, not the brain washing lies the CCP indoctrination, for you to consider.   Try to control your hysterics and conceit, toward anyone
who contradicts the CCP party line.   

Those insurgencies were, in large part, invasions of sovereign states, recognized as such by the UN, by their communist neighbors.

Now maybe you ought to top off your grey matter and learn how to behave
when your dealing with a man?----))))

Noun

1.

insurgency - an organized rebellion aimed at overthrowing a constituted government through the use of subversion and armed conflict

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/insurgency

================

An insurgency is an armed rebellion against a constituted authority (for example, an authority recognized as such by the United Nations) when those taking part in the rebellion are not recognized as belligerents

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency

==============

An invasion is a military offensive in which large parts of the armed forces of one geopolitical entity aggressively enter territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of either conquering, liberating or re-establishing control or authority over a territory, forcing the partition of a country, altering the established government or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion

 

I hope the above sources helped you to understand why my position is correct.

ISA Those insurgencies were, in large part, invasions of sovereign states, recognized as such by the UN, by their communist neighbors.
   
1.Vietnam NViets NVA with assistance from the VC, which I helped wipe out in Tet, invaded and conquored S. Viet
   A very good case can be made that the N Viet leadership used the VC in suicide attacks meant to wipe them out and
   therefore remove a possible control problems after the war. 

2. North Korea invaded South Korea.

3. In Europe the entire "Eastern Block slave states" were handed to the local MINORITY communists by the RED Army.

Must I go on?





    

Gordon Dundas wrote:

---

The entertainment value of Chinese nationalists can never be underrated. In the past year among other places they are now claiming to be entitled is the Arctic. Then you have senior Chinese military figures who routinely utter threats to other countries.
That in those other countries if one of their people had said something similar, would have resulted in their being crucified by both Government and media.

triring65 wrote:

---

Global bullyman wrote:

---

  

Oh boy! Who were present at the "San Francisco peace treaty"?

The Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declarations could become null and void only if the representatives of ALL those countries, which made them, were present and agreed to it. Otherwise, the terms of the "San Francisco peace treaty" are null and void-- As far as the un-represented country is concerned.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_San_Francisco

"People's Republic of China's objections to the treaty

Auhh, if I remember correctly PRC never attended either meetings. On top the Cairo declaration was only a statement of intention with no binding abilties