Bloomberg’s New York Bans Food Donations for the Homeless in The Politics Of War Forum

RSS
Email

0 Points

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Bloomberg’s New York Bans Food Donations for the Homeless

Author	Comment
IcelofAngeln	Bloomberg’s New York Bans Food Donations for the Homeless	Lead	[-]
Posts: 5899 Mar 21 12 6:05 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	The reign of the Moral Busybodies reaches yet new depths of insanity. Outlawed are food donations to homeless shelters because the city can’t assess their salt, fat and fiber content http://newyork.cbslocal.c...nations-to-the-homeless/
	Remove this ad
borys68		#1	[-]
Posts: 4097 Mar 21 12 6:35 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Judging by the homeless in my neighbourhood they are nuke-proof. You need excellent resilience to land up in the gutter. Borys
Nightwatch2		#2	[-]
Posts: 13072 Mar 21 12 7:25 PM Air Boss Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	because it is so much more compasionate to let the homeless starve to death rather than allow humanitarian donations of food. such a policy removes those "Useless Eaters" after all......................... Maybe the problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.
Dcnwilltex		#3	[-]
Posts: 2845 Mar 22 12 7:27 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Perhaps his intention is to cull out some of the OWS crowd, without being too obvious and politically incorrect.
Larrikin22		#4	[-]
Posts: 4331 Mar 22 12 8:08 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Dcnwilltex wrote: Perhaps his intention is to cull out some of the OWS crowd, without being too obvious and politically incorrect. Nah, it's simply the fascism inherent in the leftards. Because they think they know better than anybody else, and thus should be in charge of absolutely everything, they come up with this sort of crap all the time. You can lead a leftard to knowledge, but you can't make them think
	Remove this ad
Throd	Egregious Eugenics	#5	[-]
Posts: 4325 Mar 22 12 8:21 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Is it this board only or American society in general that has on obsession with eradicating the unwanted - either by wanting to or more frequently detecting the intention was there when none was intended? It seems to come up awfully often. While on the subject is "egregious" in common use in the US? Until Captain Sparrow explained its pronunciation in "Pirates of the Caribbean" I'd never come across it but I keep coming across it on US political sites.
sergeante		#6	[-]
Posts: 4249 Mar 22 12 8:33 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Throd wrote: Is it this board only or American society in general that has on obsession with eradicating the unwanted - either by wanting to or more frequently detecting the intention was there when none was intended? It seems to come up awfully often. It's probably moreso within this group than in general, but American society does have a fascination with those who want to eradicate the unwanted, not with the eradication of the unwanted in itself. I think it comes from our experience with the Holocaust, which was focused by our large, vocal, and influential Jewish community (10 times the size of Great Britain and Canada's put together). While on the subject is "egregious" in common use in the US? Until Captain Sparrow explained its pronunciation in "Pirates of the Caribbean" I'd never come across it but I keep coming across it on US political sites. "Egregious" does seem to be common in a lot of US writing, not so much in spoken use.
FreshAirSnipe		#7	[-]
Posts: 1891 Mar 22 12 10:13 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Because if there's anything the homeless have an excess of it's a diet high in salt, fat or fiber. Sigh.
	Remove this ad

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>