I know it's some 6 incher probably built pre-1900, almost certainly of British construction but I wouldn't mind finding out the exact model etc.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
chrisRoach |
Anyone Able To Identify This Gun? |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 114 (16-May-2008 06:15:34) |
A few weeks back I took a bit of a wander along the Hobart (edit: Tasmania, Australia) forshore to an old coast defense fortrification known as Alexandria
Battery. Up the top of the park that now occupies the location I found this gun.
I know it's some 6 incher probably built pre-1900, almost certainly of British construction but I wouldn't mind finding out the exact model etc.
Your Text Signature ...
Last Edited By: chrisRoach 16-May-2008 06:20:47.
Edited 1 time.
|
||
Gene Slover |
|||
|
Posts: 6311 (16-May-2008 09:06:23) |
Don't have a clue about the gun.
We were in Hobart, Tasmania for the Fall Harvest Festival about 1956 or 57. When you cross the Roaring 40's you know it:-) |
||
Throd |
|||
|
Posts: 569 (16-May-2008 10:48:53) |
Odd looking mounting. Do you think it was one of those guns that pop up to fire and then drop down below battlements?
|
||
Wijnand vd Beek |
It's probably an 1880's 6" Armstrong gun | ||
|
Posts: 3511 (16-May-2008 11:21:26) Dutch moderation |
It was mounted on a disappearing carriage, which is what the arm is for that you see attached to the trunnion.
Alternatively it could be a RGF (Royal Gun Factory) 6" 26 calibre gun, which was very similar to the Armstrong model. Both guns were of the old, powder charge guns that were state of the art before the cordite firing quick firing guns were introduced. Two things to note: the breach is an early interupted screw type, in which the breach screw itself seperated completely from the gun, i.e. it did not swing on a bolt attached to the gun. Second, on the last pic you can see above the left trunnion the protrusions to which the iron sight would have been attached. A gun like this would have fired a 100 lb shell at about 1900 f/s, and had a range of about 8000 yards at normal elevation (15 degrees or less). Cheers, Wijnand |
||
Tony D |
|||
|
Posts: 2362 (16-May-2008 15:57:33) Da Boss |
See this page:
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_6-26_mk1.htm Scroll down to the bottom to see the data on the 6" BL Mark V. A number of these were used for coastal batteries in Australia, so I would think that yours would be one of those weapons. |
||
Wijnand vd Beek |
|||
|
Posts: 3513 (17-May-2008 12:08:28) Dutch moderation |
Tony,
Thanks for the reference. I was checking the other early BL guns on your site and found the following note for the 5"/25 (http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_5-25_mk1.htm): 2) The propellant charge listed above is from "British Naval Guns No 14" but I believe it to be too small. This may have been an error for 14.45 lbs. (6.55 kg). "British Battleships: 1860 - 1950" says that the charge was 16 lbs. (7.26 kg) Small Pebble (S.P.) which seems more reasonable. The 4.45 lb charge is for cordite, which required a much lighter charge than the earlier gunpowder based propellants, which is the original 16 lb small pebble charge. The cordite charge (esp. the earlier, hotter burning types which were lighter than later MD types) of 4.45 lbs could be right from this perspective. When I compare the 5" gun on your site (on the Vavasseur mount) with the one above, they seem of comparable size. So maybe the gun in Oz is a 5" too. Cheers, Wijnand |
||
chrisRoach |
|||
|
Posts: 117 (17-May-2008 12:47:07) |
Thanks to all of you.
Wijnand vd Beek, I had guessed it was probably some form of disapearing mounting. Thanks for confirming that. Tony, I'd already looked at that page and suspected that it was a 6" BL Mark V.
Your Text Signature ...
|
||