| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
pukalshik |
|||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 23 (14-May-2008 17:45:42) |
It looks like US can build F-14 in emergency if it buy one from Iran :-)
|
||
wabpilot |
|||
|
Posts: 2049 (15-May-2008 01:43:50) |
pukalshik wrote: The Iranians have no production capability, thus an Iranian example would be no more, or less useful than one of our own, of which there are many in better
shape. Conversely, we have the capability of zero timing the airframes and building new engines. NADEP Oceana has everything we need to zero time the
airframes, and did so up to 2005. Production would be a much different story. First, there is no factory to build them in, so a new one would be needed.
Second, the tooling has been destroyed. Third, thhe plans, if they exist, exist on paper, not as CAD drawings which modern manufacturing calls for. Thus,
before any production could be contemplated, a set of CAD drawings would have to be generated. By the time that was done, we could produce thousands of F-18Fs
and thousands of F-35Cs, for which production facilities, training pipelines and operational squadrons do exist.
|
||
emc |
|||
|
Posts: 3754 (15-May-2008 02:17:40) |
wabpilot wrote: Gee, you make it so tough ;-)
While I think Cheney's decision to end F-14 production was almost entirely political (we'd still be building Sopwith Camels if they were built in
Wyoming), the USN's fighter force1 isn't likely to face an significant air threat in the near (say ten or fifteen years out) future, and by
that time the F-14 would be seriously obsolete. I do think the USN needs to start development of an aircraft comparable to the F-22, to enter service in
about 2015.
1 Neither is the USAF.
Last Edited By: emc
15-May-2008 02:26:23.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
wabpilot |
|||
|
Posts: 2050 (15-May-2008 05:20:56) |
emc wrote:Always glad to be of service. While I think Cheney's decision to end F-14 production was almost entirely political (we'd still be building Sopwith Camels if they were built in Wyoming)....A far better aircraft is built in Wyoming, the Pitts Special! I do think the USN needs to start development of an aircraft comparable to the F-22, to enter service in about 2015.To the extent any new manned aircraft is going to enter the naval service in 2015, it is the F-35B and F-35C. I doubt that there will be any further manned fighter aircraft developed. (I am not happy about that, but it's the way of the future.) |
||
emc |
|||
|
Posts: 3757 (15-May-2008 12:14:30) |
wabpilot wrote: I'm glad that the Pitts Special is still being built. The monoplanes used for aerobatics are just so uncool looking.
|
||
1Big Rich |
|||
|
Posts: 1858 (15-May-2008 17:24:52) |
Desertfox wrote: You know Foxy, you need to take that blind political hatred over to the Politics of War board. It really undermines your cedibility in a serious
discussion.
I agree completely, emc. I think such plane should be base on the NG YF-23 with its larger weapons bay with updated avionics developed for the F-35 program. I have to say I doubt it will happen though. Getting off (or getting shoved off, depending on your point of view) the ATF program has probably saved the Navy a lot of money, but I think its also left the service in second place behind the USAF when it comes to top-of-the-line fighters. My thoughts,
Your Text Signature ...
|
||
emc |
|||
|
Posts: 3759 (15-May-2008 18:35:27) |
While I think that Cheney's motivation for terminating the F-14 production and improvements was largely political, I believe destruction of tooling in this
case is fairly routine. I also think that the entire A-12 fiasco left quite a few people (of every political stripe) less than impressed with the general
level of competence of the USN's aviation acquisition community, so NATF was doomed regardless of the occupant of the White House.
Intelligent governments -- and I think that usually applies to the US government -- don't rubber stamp their military advisors. I'm sure the politburo said "yes" to just about every hare-brained idea that Gorshkov (sp?) came up with, and look what good it did them.
|
||
Gunnersmate04 |
So save nostalgia.. | ||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 148 (15-May-2008 22:01:56) |
Why do certain groups claim that the Bugg is a worse aircraft than the Turkey? Apparently it can do all the F-14 could, less some range maybe? I would assume
the F-35 is better still in all regards than the F-18? Of course, this won't be confirmed until its built and tested.....
GUNNER |
||
emc |
|||
|
Posts: 3763 (15-May-2008 23:11:14) |
Gunnersmate04 wrote: Back when the F-18 was entering service, the USN's aviation community was regularly writing some pretty heated letters denigrating the F-18 to such
radical publications as USNI's Proceedings; I think it's pretty much incontrovertible that the F-14 was better than the initial variants of the F-18.
When the fUSSR collapsed, much the USN's reason for the existence of the its patrol, asw, and fighter squadrons and SSN fleet also disappeared.
|
||
seasick |
Could we (US) build the A-6 in an emergency | ||
|
Posts: 4663 (16-May-2008 01:02:43) |
Why do certain groups claim that the Bugg is a worse aircraft than the Turkey?1. The "Turkey Cult": F-14 lovers. 2. The "I Hate Jack Northrup Cult": Some people have always had it in for Northrup and its off the wall designs, Its most recent product (now merged with Grumman) the B-2 seems to bring together everything that the Northrup bashers hate, especially the flying wing, into a very powerful aircraft. 3. The F/A-18 doesn't have the mussel car look of the F-14, or F-4 people. "It looks French"(barf).
Last Edited By: seasick
18-Jun-2008 06:03:45.
Edited 1 times.
|
||