If they have up to 30-40 viable F-14's available, are they to be taken lightly or does it come down to training and expierence? How did the F-14's fare against the Soviet and French built fighters of IRAQ when they tangled?
GUNNER
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Gunnersmate04 |
PHOENIX | ||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 142 (13-May-2008 17:20:04) |
Were we stupid enough to also sell them PHONENIX missles also or are they using something similar bought from NK or Russia?
If they have up to 30-40 viable F-14's available, are they to be taken lightly or does it come down to training and expierence? How did the F-14's fare against the Soviet and French built fighters of IRAQ when they tangled? GUNNER |
||
emc |
|||
|
Posts: 3747 (13-May-2008 17:51:56) |
Gunnersmate04 wrote: Of course we sold F-14's and Phoenix missiles to our beloved client, the Shah of Iran. In retrospect, this clearly was not the wisest decision.
I also remember hearing that the Iranians had used their F-14's more as AWACS aircraft than for front line combat, as they were considered too valuable to risk. |
||
Nightwatch2 |
|||
|
Posts: 3564 (13-May-2008 18:20:30) |
We sold the Shah's Air Force the early version of the AIM-54A, which was not particularly effective against fighters. They did, by some accounts, manage
to employ it successfully against Iraqi AF fighters.
they have, as noted, primarily used their remaining, flyable F-14's more as AWACS than as fighters for the simple reason that they needed an AWACS more than they needed the fighter capability.
Republican; because not everyone can be on welfare.
|
||
Obi Wan Russell |
|||
|
Posts: 213 (13-May-2008 18:21:00) |
The Iranian Air force currently has 44 fully operational Tomcats with more coming online as the refurbishment program continues. The Phoenix missile is not
currently thought to be operational with the IRIAF any more, though they did sell some to the Russians in the 80s along with a flyable Tomcat. At the moment
the IRIAF F-4 and F-14 fleets are believed to use a locally produced reverse engineered version of the Hawk SAM adapted for Air to Air use. More for show than
a serious threat at the moment, but it does give them a starting point for the development of more advanced AAMs, probably with the help of former Soviet
engineers who haven't been paid for some time by their own country...
|
||
seasick |
Can we (US) build the F11F Tiger again in an emergency | ||
|
Posts: 4654 (13-May-2008 18:56:37) |
. . . probably with the help of former Soviet engineers who haven't been paid for some time by their own country...The economy in Russia has picked up to a decent level and the government has a decent amount of tax revenue at their treasury. The air to air hawk was developed for the Iran-Iraq war to defend against Saddam's Scud attacks on major Iranian cities. Terhan was the subject of several Scud saturation attacks. As for the computer power you need to process radar data and to control a mechanically scanned radar like a AWG-9, I suppose it could be done by a desk top computer.
Last Edited By: seasick
18-Jun-2008 06:02:14.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
Obi Wan Russell |
|||
|
Posts: 214 (13-May-2008 19:24:48) |
Russia may be on the rise once more but it's aerospace industry is nowhere near the levels it had in the Soviet era. Plenty of highly qualified and
experienced aerospace engineers floating around. A modern desktop (or even a modern Laptop/ Notebook) will take up very little room in something like an F-14.
My point was not to underestimate the engineering capabilities of Iran, nor their ability to improvise solutions in order to get around sanctions and
embargoes.
|
||
Nightwatch2 |
|||
|
Posts: 3565 (13-May-2008 21:03:23) |
I think 44 operational F-14's with more coming is probably a bit of a stretch.
Republican; because not everyone can be on welfare.
|
||
Gunnersmate04 |
AWACS | ||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 144 (13-May-2008 21:33:10) |
Surely, they wouldn't use these to try and dogfight with a 22 or even a 15......are these to be used I would assume to knock out our AWACS.
How did they fare against the IRAQ boys? GUNNER |
||
Nightwatch2 |
|||
|
Posts: 3567 (13-May-2008 23:19:43) |
Gunnersmate04 wrote: they use their remaining F-14's AS an AWACS, not go after ours.
Republican; because not everyone can be on welfare.
|
||
flyingdutchman1980 |
|||
|
Posts: 58 (14-May-2008 15:20:19) |
Nightwatch2 wrote: Agree with Nightwatch on more than one account; - Would be very suprised if the Iranians managed to get 44 Tomcats (or even only half of that) in the air, let alone "fully operational" as ObiWan Russell posts. By halfway '80s they managed to get 10/20ish in the air for a parade and was generally thought they had cannabilized the remainder. If the Iranians had more planes they would've showed them. I also think that rebuilding previously cannibalized airplanes is either not worth the hassle or beyond the Iranian's capabilities, even with Israëli/Russian/French whoever's help. - The F-14's did reasonably well during Iran/Iraq war but exactly how good will never be known. At least one was lost IIRC to Iraqi Mirage F-1 but they downed at least 4ish Iraqi airplanes. I thought the Phoenix missiles didn't do that good; some sources say none of the Phoenix missiles hit something and others indicate up to 25 kills with the AIM-54's, so again no certainty. - If the Iranians get into any conflict more likely than not they'll use the F-14's as AWACS with it's radar and tv cam (if the Iranian's one are all fitted with these). Probably because of lack of Phoenix missiles (Sparrows or other AAM's can also be carried by other, cheaper airplanes), relative value of the Tomcats for the Iranians and perhaps trouble with it's maintenance. Smartest thing the Iranians can do IMHO is try to keep as many of these beasts airborne for as little costs as possible. Let the Israëli's/Americans/etc worry about their state but I would rather spend my money on something newer, those airframes are more than 30 years old by now... Sure B-52's are still around and a lot older, but trying to keep attrition down has to be practically impossible on 32-year old American airframes which you try to keep flying with limited indiginous industry (Iran Aircraft Industries) and limited Russian/whoever's help. |
||