stanger69 wrote:
Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?
Another F-22 Raptor.
I still agree with what this guy said.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
stanger69 |
|||
|
Posts: 19 ( 4-May-2008 01:20:45) |
stanger69 wrote:
|
||
pukalshik |
|||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 20 ( 5-May-2008 09:43:05) |
OT, but Mig 1.42 test machine had much bigger thrust to wait ratio then Raptor. It would have been a better plane if produced. Probably not a better fighter in
terms of stealth.
|
||
Getz |
|||
|
Posts: 386 ( 6-May-2008 18:38:32) |
BEN1 wrote: I appreciate that the topic has moved on a bit, but I've been doing a bit of reseach and apparently the "Flyaway" cost of the Typhoon is about $100 million |
||
Desertfox.historypolitics... |
|||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 62 ( 8-May-2008 04:11:10) |
The premise of the TLAMs was to knock out the Irani F-14 force, can they do it?
Do they have the range (Iran is much bigger than Iraq)? Do they have the accuracy to hit harden shelters? Do they have the warheads to take out the shelters? Will there be enough of them to take out every single shelter? What if the F-14s are airborne, can they take out the airfields? What's going to launch them? Is the US going to risk Ticos and SSNs in the Persian Gulf? Remember, the Iraqi AF was taken out by F-117s with LGBs, not TLAMs. |
||
Gunnersmate04 |
.... the Iraqi AF was taken out by F-117s with LGBs, WRONG! | ||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 137 ( 9-May-2008 17:31:52) |
I took them all out; they dropped me behind enemy lines and I took them all out with my Swiss Army knife and some PD-680 in the fuel tanks.... I was back in
time for "Dinner for the Crew".
I AM A WEAPONS SYSYTEM, AND THEY'RE WAS A SEVERE COST OVER-RUN!!!
GUNNER |
||
emc |
|||
|
Posts: 3737 ( 9-May-2008 17:55:31) |
Desertfox wrote: In the Gulf War (under the current US President's father), the F-117's most assuredly did not function without considerable support, including
strikes by AH-64 Apaches against Iraqi air defense radars near the frontiers. Indeed, with the general level of EW support accorded the F-117's, they
probably could have gone in with their navigation lights on, accompanied by a brass band.
|
||
FreeloaderUK |
|||
|
Posts: 129 (10-May-2008 21:35:08) |
the latest Mig29 might stand a chance, afterall she's recently made toast of a Georgian UAV & those have low radar cross sections
|
||
Michael Hoddy |
|||
|
Posts: 187 (12-May-2008 17:00:16) |
Desertfox wrote: I think the Iraqi AF and their airfields were actually dealt with mostly by F-15E's, F-111's, and Tornados, at least in terms of a percentage of sorties. Probably some F-16's and A-6's as well. |
||
Desertfox.historypolitics... |
|||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 65 (13-May-2008 02:12:10) |
Yeah but my point was that the shelters themselves were taken out by 2,000lb LGBs dropped from F-117s, not by TLAMs. I know the F-117s had support, and the
airfields where blasted by just about everyone, but to take out harden shelters you need pin point accuracy and a good warhead. Can the TLAM do it?
|
||
taschoene |
|||
|
Posts: 4230 (13-May-2008 02:59:05) |
Can a Tomahawk hit a hardened aircraft shelter? Absolutely! The typical description of TLAM accuracy is that it can not only hit a specified building, but
that it can pick which window to fly though.
Can it penetrate? Well, the usual blast-frag warhead might not penetrate the top of an HAS, but the missile can probably impact directly on the door, which is likely to be unpleasant for whatever is inside. I don't recall whether the Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator variant has reached service (the Web seems to say yes, but I thought I remembered it being cancelled a year or two back). If it has, I'm sure it can penetrate an HAS from above if necessary. |
||