| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Desertfox.historypolitics... |
|||
|
Registered Member
Posts: 57 (27-Apr-2008 04:37:22) |
It would be interesting to see a month by month list of available BBs for both sides. See when the Germans would have the greates advantage.
|
||
borys68 |
|||
|
Posts: 2543 (27-Apr-2008 07:16:32) |
Ahoj!
The HMS Erin had 14" guns. Borys |
||
Syphon1 |
|||
|
Posts: 460 (27-Apr-2008 07:56:48) |
borys68 wrote: Actually 13.5" but the correction has been made. Transcription error![]()
I actually had it written down correctly on the back of an envelope I had my telly written on.
We satisfy our endless needs
And justify our bloody deeds
In the name of destiny
And in the name of God
David
|
||
CJvR |
|||
|
Posts: 2145 (27-Apr-2008 09:12:30) |
Syphon1 wrote: |
||
Syphon1 |
Lutzow and Hindenburg | ||
|
Posts: 461 (27-Apr-2008 10:41:45) |
A question?
I have just been looking at the BC availability and something jumped out at me. Why did Derfflinger take 14 months from launch to commissioning yet Lutzow and Hindenburg took 21 months? Was this due to a slowdown in construction? If so then in Letterstime they might very well arrive sooner then in OTL as the yards wouldn't have lost as many men and the KLM has proved to all and sundry that it can and will fight. Not only this but it can fight and win against greater odds. Yes I know Lutzow had a wonky turbine that has been blamed on every thing from poor workmanship to wrong use but Hindenburg didn't yet took approximately the same time?
We satisfy our endless needs
And justify our bloody deeds
In the name of destiny
And in the name of God
David
|
||
Dave Bender |
Equitable exchange for Posen and Rheinland being Sunk | ||
|
Posts: 6464 (27-Apr-2008 13:39:25) |
Body count is a poor measure of victory. Look at the historical Battle of Jutland. Germany won the body count but Britain won the battle by maintaining the
blockade. The same thing applies to the Battle of Coral Sea. Japan won the body count but the U.S. Navy won the fight by preventing Japan from landing an
infantry regiment at Port Moresby.
The HSF is accomplishing their military objectives at an acceptable cost in casualties. That is what counts. Don't waste your time trying to explain that to an amateur like the Kaiser. The military professionals like Field Marshal Falkenhayn and Crown Prinz Wilhelm will understand it just fine. |
||
CJvR |
|||
|
Posts: 2147 (27-Apr-2008 16:33:17) |
Desertfox wrote: My best guesstimate...
It will be a long, hard dangerous winter for the RN with poor weather and long dark nights filled with HSF ships...
Last Edited By: CJvR
27-Apr-2008 16:51:44.
Edited 4 times.
|
||
CJvR |
|||
|
Posts: 2148 (27-Apr-2008 16:35:22) |
My best guesstimate...
It will be a long, hard dangerous winter for the RN with poor weather and long dark nights filled with HSF ships...
Last Edited By: CJvR
28-Apr-2008 14:02:04.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
borys68 |
|||
|
Posts: 2544 (27-Apr-2008 20:07:41) |
Ahoj!
I stand corrected - 343mm then Borys |
||
Roller007 |
|||
|
Posts: 1154 (27-Apr-2008 23:59:07) |
Lutzow and Baden were both held up in there construction in 1914 due to the fact that the Schichau Danzig yard was threatened with the early advance of the
Russians. They held up construction and expedited vessels that could be launched sooner. The result was that they were held up for almost 180 days.
Interestingly the Lutzow had her work stopped while working on her turbines. When work resumed, Baden had one of the fastest Launch to commisioning times for a
DN short of Kronprinz Wilhelm's 260 days. As for Hindenburg, she got caught up in war politics, labour shortages at Kiel and kept having her work started
and stopped due to the poor performance of the HSF.
|
||