Someone said in a thread elsewhere that there is little chance of a return to an all dark blue FAA; I can think of one scenario which might bring it about and it would be driven by thwarted political will and the sheer problem of recruitment.
CVF continues to survive not because of defined roles and capabilities, which the Defence Select Committee now thinks should be reviewed, but because it is a political response to an uncertain future. And it is cross-party (but not Lib Dem where Lord Garden, (Air Marshal, Retired) and Defence spokesman, briefs against it at every opportunity). CVF it seems is verging on the bomb-proof. Too many jobs ride on it and the basic sentiment that CVF brings with it power projection, influence and a presence on the world stage seems continually to carry the day, despite, the very active counter-briefing of the press that seems to be taking place if the stories in some newspapers are anything to go by.
But the Air Group is a problem. This might not be totally clear to many politicians at present. They are still fed on the figure of 36 fast jets on CVF. They probably don't know that the FAA's fixed wing was destroyed by stealth and the current RAF policy of one squadron only per CVF (now only nine aircraft) for most of the time has the effect of turning the CVF into a white elephant. But one day they will and they will wonder how their clear intentions were hi-jacked. For it will become obvious that the chances of assembling a full strength air group in times of crisis will be remote because of lack of pilot experience and a dearth of any continuous experience in handling the numbers involved on one flight deck - one jamboree every two years not being enough.
The politicians will also discover there is a recruitment problem: pilots would rather stay home nights - and for the few dark blue people there is no career path. The only way out of this would be to separate out the F35 buy into FAA and RAF: the RAF would have F35C (strong airframe for low-level- deep-strike) and the FAA, F35B for high sortie rates etc, more appropriate to CAS and CAP. Each Service would have its own esprit de corps and the FAA would again be a serious fast-jet Naval Air Command with its own identity and proper career prospects. Naval fixed-wing aviation would once more be an attractive proposition. The arguments for a joint force would not stand because essentially the aircraft are different types.
And all this can happen, like CVF itself, because of an exercise in political will.
One can dream, eh?
