<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Turret rangefinders </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6453/t/Turret-rangefinders.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ What was the idea behind turret range finders by WW2? I have seen written several opinions :

  1. They where intended to be the main RFs once the enemy was close enough to see properly.

  2. They were armoured back ups in case the DCT ones were knocked out.

  3. They were another set of readings to be averaged with the DCTs.

Although of generally larger base length once firing commenced they would have vision problems. Does the answer vary between navies?
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:29:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83946/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-83946</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Something to do with keeping your best equipment and moving it to the best locations in the light of experience and changes elsewhere? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bill sanderson)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83946</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83624/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-83624</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Although the turret charactoristics did have much to do with the baselength, even in WW2 the longer baselength of the turret RFs was considered important, not
just a useful by product. The Repulse survived its weight sensitive refit in the 1930&#39;s with three 30ft RFs and three 15ft RFs, two of 30fts being left on
the turrets. The 30ft on A turret was additional to the normal 15ft and could easily have been removed if the 15ft was regarded as sufficient. Similarly on the
Renown the RN took... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Throd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83624</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83524/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-83524</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It remained important in WW2 for each turret to be able to fight on as a self-contained unit if other turrets and parts of the central FC system were knocked
out (as long as power was available). The Germans were the key exponents of durability (ie take heavy damage and stay in the battle) in their ships from the
WW1 era onwards and the RN became even more committed to this post-Jutland. The fact that turret rangefinders had a longer base than those on the
superstructure was handy when... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bill sanderson)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83524</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83421/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-83421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Throd: 1,2,3 a mix of all three, 4 yes, 5 yes.
<br>
<br>
Dirt Doc: Long baselength turret rangefinders in the RN were roughly contemperaneous with the developments in centralised fire control (1905-1915). See Brooks
for a full discussion. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NewGolconda)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83421</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83413/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-83413</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Turret rangefinders go back to the 1880&#39;s when all fire control was still local. When the RN went to centrallized fire control, gun turrets continued to be
equipped with rangefinders to enable the ship to fight even when the main/secondary directors were disabled.
<br>
<br>
DD ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (DirtDoc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83413</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83018/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-83018</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In WWII rangefinders had the same purpose as before WWII.
<br>
<br>
Rangefinders were put in turrets to measure range to the target.
<br>
<br>
Turret rangefinders are generally of longer base length and are slightly more accurate than their shorter cousins. But they are not very much more accurate and
its not too important to have as accurate a range as you may think.
<br>
<br>
In the turret the operator is also in the turret so he is not subjected to the noise and muzzle blast as... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gene Slover)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83018</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:27:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/82997/t/Turret-rangefinders.html#reply-82997</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Gene&#39;ll more likely will pipe in on this as this is his forte
<br>
<br>
NUFF SAID
<br>
<br>
BOB ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BOBC 59)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/82997</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Turret rangefinders  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6453/t/Turret-rangefinders.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What was the idea behind turret range finders by WW2? I have seen written several opinions :
<br>
  1. They where intended to be the main RFs once the enemy was close enough to see properly.
<br>
  2. They were armoured back ups in case the DCT ones were knocked out.
<br>
  3. They were another set of readings to be averaged with the DCTs.
<br>
Although of generally larger base length once firing commenced they would have vision problems. Does the answer vary between navies?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Throd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6453</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>