Simple premise re pearl harbour http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6185/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Sun, 11 May 2008 23:36:10 GMT Mon, 12 May 2008 15:19:20 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6185/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Simple premise re pearl harbour ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79227/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html#reply-79227 Rather unlikely as Japan was just finishing up the Manchurian war with the Soviet Union in September 1939. They lost that conflict because the small Japanese economy could not supply enough artillery ammunition to the Imperial Japanese Army. Adding the US as an enemy under those circumstances would be rather outlandish even by WWII Japanese standards. The Imperial Japanese Army would flat out refuse to supply troops for this adventure.

You might get a naval battle if the US... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Dave Bender) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79227 Mon, 12 May 2008 15:18:36 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Simple premise re pearl harbour ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79205/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html#reply-79205
Assuming the Pacific Fleet is visiting PH at the time, the IJN strike will be 1/3 weaker. The two Shōkaku-class carriers were not in commission at that time and, I think, Hiryu was just in commisson so her air group will be green.


Also, the Zero had just gone into volume production, if it... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Dolphinstriker) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79205 Mon, 12 May 2008 06:09:18 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Simple premise re pearl harbour ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79201/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html#reply-79201 Shōkaku-class carriers were not in commission at that time and, I think, Hiryu was just in commisson so her air group will be green. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SMS12) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79201 Mon, 12 May 2008 04:09:31 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Simple premise re pearl harbour ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79199/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html#reply-79199
Pearl Harbor was only a resupply & forward operating base until 1941!

The US Pacific Fleet (the battleships, and most of the cruisers & carriers) was based in San Diego, CA and San Francisco, CA (with smaller parts in Long Beach, CA and Bremerton, WA) until June 1940, when President Roosevelt ordered... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (bager1968) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79199 Mon, 12 May 2008 03:25:24 GMT <![CDATA[ Simple premise re pearl harbour ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6185/t/Simple-premise-re-pearl-harbour.html feeds@yuku.com (Razor) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6185 Sun, 11 May 2008 23:36:10 GMT