<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept? </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6147/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 


Link.

http://www.qinetiq.com/home/newsroom/news_releases_homepage/2008/2nd_quarter/naval_design_partnership.Par.2049.File.tmp/FCS%20concept.jpg ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:28:37 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:47:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79175/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">WIWD wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Ken,
  <br>
  <br>
  Sir, when you make your argument as clearly as you have I must bow before logic and simple plain sanity. I now heartily agree with you that the US have made
  a complete mess of their next generation ship designs and that whatever the UK does, we will do better than you; and anybody who disagrees with us is a
  bounder and a cad!
</blockquote>

<p> Better in the sense that our mess will be even... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79175</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:47:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79151/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ OK, I&#39;ll give you that <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif">
<br>
<br>
As a US chum of mine once said, DDG1000 doesn&#39;t float, it&#39;s repelled by the ocean! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Moskit)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79151</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79149/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ken,
<br>
<br>
Sir, when you make your argument as clearly as you have I must bow before logic and simple plain sanity. I now heartily agree with you that the US have made a
complete mess of their next generation ship designs and that whatever the UK does, we will do better than you; and anybody who disagrees with us is a bounder
and a cad! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WIWD)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79149</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:18:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79106/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Gentlemen, we have hit a new low. Once upon a time, we used to argue about who had the BEST navy. Now we argue about who has the WORST ...
<br>
<br>
Dickon M ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dickon M)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79106</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79102/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-style: italic;">Why&#39;s that then? Anything concrete or just succumbing to the general &quot;glass half empty&quot; pessimism of the
board?</span> <img style="font-style: italic;" src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif" alt="image">
<br>

<p style="font-style: italic;">Well because it was developed jointly by the UK MoD and UK industry it <strong><u>must</u></strong> be worse than anything the
Americans/Europeans/Russians/Chinese/Ruritanians... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Ken the Coastie)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79102</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79076/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79076</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Moskit wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Why&#39;s that then? Anything concrete or just succumbing to the general &quot;glass half empty&quot; pessimism of the board? <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif" alt="image">
</blockquote>

<p> Well because it was developed jointly by the UK MoD and UK industry it <strong><u>must</u></strong> be worse than anything the
Americans/Europeans/Russians/Chinese/Ruritanians (delete as... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WIWD)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79076</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79074/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-79074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Why&#39;s that then? Anything concrete or just succumbing to the general &quot;glass half empty&quot; pessimism of the board? <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Moskit)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79074</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:54:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78909/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-78909</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It is my understanding that the graphic is just some internal PV work that hasn&#39;t been done for the FSC project (otherwise why would they need the NDP?). ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WIWD)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78909</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78841/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-78841</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Warmed over T23 for a graphic! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sunk at Narvik)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78841</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78810/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-78810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;ve got a bad feeling about this. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perfectgeneral)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78810</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78804/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-78804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Removed as it is a repeat of above.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78804</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78803/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html#reply-78803</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ (Source: QinetiQ; issued May 7, 2008)
<br>
<br>
QinetiQ has signed an initial 11 month contract with the MOD as part of a £2m pilot study which will see a new joint MOD / industry naval ship design office
established in Bristol, to be tasked with the design of complex naval ships for the Royal Navy, such as the Future Surface Combatant.  
<br>
 
<br>
The Naval Design Partnership (NDP), with its &#39;rainbow team&#39; of talent, which includes Thales, BAE Systems, VT Group, Babcock and BMT,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78803</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ QinetiQ signs naval design partnership - C1 concept?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6147/t/QinetiQ-signs-naval-design-partnership-C1-concept-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://www.qinetiq.com/home/newsroom/news_releases_homepage/2008/2nd_quarter/naval_design_partnership.Par.2049.File.tmp/FCS%20concept.jpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
Link.
<br>
http://www.qinetiq.com/home/newsroom/news_releases_homepage/2008/2nd_quarter/naval_design_partnership.Par.2049.File.tmp/FCS%20concept.jpg ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rob)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6147</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:28:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>