<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor? </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6042/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Barring early introduction of the F-35, which fighter aircraft of today stands the best chance against the F-22 in either a single one-on-one dogfight or as a
larger six-on-six engagement?


A few picks that might stand a chance....


Mikoyan MiG-35 (albeit, more than just one will need to be built)

JAS 39 Gripen

Dassault Rafale

Sukhoi Su-35

Eurofighter Typhoon

Chengdu J-10


I believe that none of these aircraft will have the comparable interconnectivity of the F-22s to succeed in the... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:58:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80517/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80517</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">taschoene wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Design rights may or may not belong to the government -- in general that only happens for winning designs. (Sikorsky building Apache parts is due to an
  industry-to-industry deal, not government assignment of the workshare, I believe. And it&#39;s more than just tailplanes; Sikorsky also supplies some of the
  flight avionics and other assorted bits.)
  <br>
  <br>
</blockquote>

<p> Actually, Sikorsky was... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80517</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:58:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80516/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ...As taschoene mentioned, the F401 was the P&amp;W engine that was supposed to be in the F-14. 
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80516</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80485/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <br>
ASTER 30
<br>
<br>
All this mano a mano crap has had its day just blow em away and get on with the war ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Razor)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80485</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:03:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80278/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80278</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">emc wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  which is why some F-401 engines were (are?) built by P&amp;W, not GE
  <br>
</blockquote>

<p>???  The F401 was always a Pratt design; GE never built any that I know of.  Besides, the F401 never saw widespread production, since it was meant for the
abortive F-14B Super Tomcat.   The later F-14B and F14D were powered by GE F110 engines.</p>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80278</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:10:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80275/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80275</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Design rights may or may not belong to the government -- in general that only happens for winning designs. (Sikorsky building Apache parts is due to an
industry-to-industry deal, not government assignment of the workshare, I believe. And it&#39;s more than just tailplanes; Sikorsky also supplies some of the
flight avionics and other assorted bits.)
<br>
<br>
But regardless of the assignment of design rights, any attempt to export the F-23 would run afoul of a couple of other major obstacles.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80275</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80262/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80262</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Gunnersmate04 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  What would prevent Northrop/MD from selling the F-23 to another country? building here for export to anybody willing to pay for it?
  <br>
  GUNNER
</blockquote>

<p> As with most other military hardware, the rights to the F-23 are owned by the US government, which is why some F-401 engines were (are?) built by P&amp;W,
not GE, and the USArmy could have given production of the AGT-1500 to Garrett (which was, I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80262</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80240/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80240</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <br>
  What would prevent Northrop/MD from selling the F-23 to another country? building here for export to anybody willing to pay for it?
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Congress and the Department of Defense. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gernsback)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80240</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80233/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80233</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What would prevent Northrop/MD from selling the F-23 to another country? building here for export to anybody willing to pay for it?
<br>
GUNNER ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gunnersmate04)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80233</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80148/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Russian S-37 (aka Su-47) forward-swept wing design was a one-off demonstrator and is not being further developed. They&#39;ve been through a couple of
iterations of new designs (MFI, now PAK-FA, for which the Sukhoi T-50 was chosen). They seem to be getting more conventional as they go; the ultimate design
may be something a bit like a cross between the Su-27 and the F-22.
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80148</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80080/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80080</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Anyone catch the latest &quot;DOGFIGHTS&quot; on the History Channel last night? It was a 2 hour special on the Generation 5 fighters (F-22,F-35.etc.) against
the purported threats on the horizon. The Russian&#39;s have some foward swept wing in development and the Rafael was the other matchup. Scenarios were 4
Raptors vs. like 14 Mig-30 or 21 Mig-29&#39;s.
<br>
Very interesting, of course all conjecture as it has never happened but it showed the few flaws the F-22 may encounter.
<br>
GUNNER... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gunnersmate04)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80080</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:13:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80049/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-80049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ As I&#39;ve heard it, the Black Widow was faster and more stealthy than the Raptor, the Raptor however had thrust vectoring. I would give the edge to the Black
Widow in BVR, and to the Raptor WVR. However they are too closely matched to accuratly predict a result. Course the Black Widow wins hands down in the
cooleness factor! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Desertfox)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80049</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79977/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79977</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Where was the Black Widow better than the F-22? Could it have beaten the RAPTOR in a equal pilot scenario?
<br>
GUNNER ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gunnersmate04)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79977</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79880/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79880</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That&#39;s awesome!  I bet Chuck would be as formidable in the air as he would be as a CIWS onboard a ship (with a machette).  Awesome, simply awesome. 
<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/roll.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bunzov Steele)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79880</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79860/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79860</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The best fighter to face the F-22 is Chuck Norris in a jet pack. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Belushi TD)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79860</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:54:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79842/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I understand that the Meteor will be a great leveller in BVR contacts. Certainly one on the side for the EF / Rifraf. If Meteor gets into the F35 you might
have a very interesting prospect.
<br>
<br>
Don&#39;t EF and Rifraf also have IR, and I understand that Captor isn&#39;t a slouch? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (hulahoop7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79842</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:58:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79263/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Can a Tomahawk hit a hardened aircraft shelter?  Absolutely!  The typical description of TLAM accuracy is that it can not only hit a specified building, but
that it can pick which window to fly though.
<br>
<br>
Can it penetrate?  Well, the usual blast-frag warhead might not penetrate the top of an HAS, but the missile can probably impact directly on the door, which is
likely to be unpleasant for whatever is inside.  I don&#39;t recall whether the Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator variant has... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79263</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79261/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79261</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yeah but my point was that the shelters themselves were taken out by 2,000lb LGBs dropped from F-117s, not by TLAMs. I know the F-117s had support, and the
airfields where blasted by just about everyone, but to take out harden shelters you need pin point accuracy and a good warhead. Can the TLAM do it? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Desertfox)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79261</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79229/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79229</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Desertfox wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  The premise of the TLAMs was to knock out the Irani F-14 force, can they do it?
  <br>
  <br>
  Do they have the range (Iran is much bigger than Iraq)? Do they have the accuracy to hit harden shelters? Do they have the warheads to take out the shelters?
  Will there be enough of them to take out every single shelter? What if the F-14s are airborne, can they take out the airfields? What&#39;s going to launch
  them?... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Michael Hoddy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79229</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79091/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-79091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ the latest Mig29 might stand a chance, afterall she&#39;s recently made toast of a Georgian UAV &amp; those have low radar cross sections ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (FreeloaderUK)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79091</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78989/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html#reply-78989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Desertfox wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  The premise of the TLAMs was to knock out the Irani F-14 force, can they do it?
  <br>
  <br>
  Do they have the range (Iran is much bigger than Iraq)? Do they have the accuracy to hit harden shelters? Do they have the warheads to take out the shelters?
  Will there be enough of them to take out every single shelter? What if the F-14s are airborne, can they take out the airfields? What&#39;s going to launch
  them?... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78989</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Best fighter today to face against F-22 Raptor?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6042/t/Best-fighter-today-to-face-against-F-22-Raptor-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Barring early introduction of the F-35, which fighter aircraft of today stands the best chance against the F-22 in either a single one-on-one dogfight or as a
larger six-on-six engagement?
<br>
<br>
A few picks that might stand a chance....
<br>
<br>
Mikoyan MiG-35 (albeit, more than just one will need to be built)
<br>
JAS 39 Gripen
<br>
Dassault Rafale
<br>
Sukhoi Su-35
<br>
Eurofighter Typhoon
<br>
Chengdu J-10
<br>
<br>
I believe that none of these aircraft will have the comparable... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Admiral Beez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6042</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>