<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF? </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6037/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ http://defensenews.com/story.php?i=3488563&amp;c=EUR&amp;s=SEA ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:34:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78117/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-78117</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If CVF were wrested away from Brown&#39;s consituency, I doubt it would last long. It&#39;s bomb-proof at the moment. If Labour gets clobbered today, Brown
will be pushing it through so that those nasty Tories can&#39;t take it away in two years time when they come to power. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Colin Mc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78117</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:34:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78092/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-78092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ PA2 hull is a full french build.  Far more sensible than the high risk, untried superblock approach, which is grounded far more in pork barrel politics, short
term vote grabbing, and borderline corruption than any appreciation of the engineering, economics, or defense implications.  If PA2 is looking dodgy I propose
we take the spare slot in the french graving dock- stuff superblocks, babcock et al, we need carriers rather more than short term false boosts to local
interests, and a great deal... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Meeware)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78092</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77438/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Bledlow wrote:</strong>
    <hr>

    <p>&quot;France is left with the fiscal and political liability of supporting a Scottish shipbuilding sector&quot; is clearly referring to Scottish
    content. What significant Scottish workshare do you believe it will contain?
    <br></p>
  </blockquote>Are you going to claim that there will be no Scottish workshare for PA2? All of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77438</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77433/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77433</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Despite much talk to the contrary, the UK and France are running essentally running separate projects for the manufacture of CVF UK and CV FR (aka PA2).
<br>
<br>
PA2 has been modifed to use the same General Electric/Avio LM2500 gas turbines that will be fitted to the Franco-Italian FREMM frigates - no business for R-R
there!
<br>
<br>
France has saved Euro 200-300 million in design costs by buying in to CVF, but expects to save only about Euro 50 million during its manufacture from... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Richard B)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77433</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77394/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <br>
  Are you going to claim that there will be no Scottish workshare for PA2? All of the superblocks are going to be built in France? Nonsense.
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
No part of the hull of PA2 would have been built in the UK. The only major workshare lost through cancellation would have been the MT30s by Rolls-Royce. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rob)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77394</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77366/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77366</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Is the Brunei OPV fiasco something to be proud of?
</blockquote>

<p> In fairness to BAE, the major &#39;problem&#39; with the Brunei OPV is that Brunei&#39;s ambitions were greater than their skills. They purchased some very
advanced light frigates, and then found that nobody in their navy actually had the experience needed to operate and maintain such ships. The ships themselves
are just fine.
<br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jim WH)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77366</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77335/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Bledlow wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
    <hr>

    <blockquote>
      <strong class="quote-title">Bledlow wrote:</strong>
      <hr>

      <blockquote>
        <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
        <hr>
        ... Without a doubt, any British content in PA2 will cost more than French content, for the simple reason that the British shipbuilding sector is most... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CVA02)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77335</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77333/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77333</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">reiverman wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <p>If the UK shipbuilding is so inefficient then how come both VT &amp; BAE systems have won major export orders recently ?
  <br>
  http://www.baesystems.com/ProductsServices/autoGen_106920132255.html
  <br></p>
</blockquote>

<p> </p>Is the Brunei OPV fiasco something to be proud of? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CVA02)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77333</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77264/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Bledlow wrote:</strong>
    <hr>

    <blockquote>
      <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
      <hr>
      ... Without a doubt, any British content in PA2 will cost more than French content, for the simple reason that the British shipbuilding sector is most
      decrepit in Western Europe. The benefits of share design and engineering have been diluted by... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77264</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:52:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77261/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77261</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>If the UK shipbuilding is so inefficient then how come both VT &amp; BAE systems have won major export orders recently ?
<br>
http://www.baesystems.com/ProductsServices/autoGen_106920132255.html
<br>
http://www.vtplc.com/shipbuilding/newsdetails.asp?ItemID=723</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (reiverman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77261</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77260/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77260</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Bledlow wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    ... Without a doubt, any British content in PA2 will cost more than French content, for the simple reason that the British shipbuilding sector is most
    decrepit in Western Europe. The benefits of share design and engineering have been diluted by British intransigence, namely the lowered specification
    sought by the RN for the sake... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CVA02)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77260</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77177/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77177</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">CVA02 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  ... Without a doubt, any British content in PA2 will cost more than French content, for the simple reason that the British shipbuilding sector is most
  decrepit in Western Europe. The benefits of share design and engineering have been diluted by British intransigence, namely the lowered specification sought
  by the RN for the sake of economy. France is left with the fiscal and political liability of supporting a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77177</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77150/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think some here are underestimating French budget problems, apparently they are worse than the UK&#39;s, the figure of a 40% shortfall gets mentioned from
time to time. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rob)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77150</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77138/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Obi Wan Russell wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  The minister may be dropping hints, but his boss, Sarkozy is definitely behind the project. French politicians tend to speak &#39;out of line&#39; more than
  British pollys do, so I wouldn&#39;t worry too much yet. This probably follows the British-only order for steel for the two CVFs, as the whole point of PA2
  was to generate economies of scale by being part of a three ship project. The French were... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CVA02)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77138</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77135/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Is it possible that the French Defence Minister is negotiating for more money: The President isn&#39;t giving me enough money for Defence, so if anything gets
canceled, it should be whatever would be most politically damaging to the President?
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m also not very impressed by the line in the article: &quot;Sarkozy had mooted the building of a second French aircraft carrier as early as February last
year when he was campaigning for the presidency.&quot; Are they really suggesting... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nathan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77135</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77133/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html#reply-77133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The minister may be dropping hints, but his boss, Sarkozy is definitely behind the project. French politicians tend to speak &#39;out of line&#39; more than
British pollys do, so I wouldn&#39;t worry too much yet. This probably follows the British-only order for steel for the two CVFs, as the whole point of PA2 was
to generate economies of scale by being part of a three ship project. The French were probably hoping for a larger share of the work too, much more than a
third of the overall... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Obi Wan Russell)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77133</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ PA2 likely to be cancelled - knockon effects for CVF?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6037/t/PA2-likely-to-be-cancelled-knockon-effects-for-CVF-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <a target="_blank" href="http://defensenews.com/story.php?i=3488563&amp;c=EUR&amp;s=SEA">http://defensenews.com/story.php?i=3488563&amp;c=EUR&amp;s=SEA</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mikey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6037</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>