http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6035/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:22:27 GMT Wed, 07 May 2008 07:30:42 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6035/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78715/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-78715
An additional suggestion that occurred to me as I read your most recent post in this thread is to allow the designer of a vessel to choose different type of ammunition for the same gun. For example, a 16"/50-caliber gun could have both 1,900-lb HC and 2,700-lb AP shells in the same ammo load.
Also, the durability ratings (so many shells of a given weight or so many torpedoes to sink the ship) should be revised to include how many bombs of different weights... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Michael Garrity) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78715 Wed, 07 May 2008 07:30:40 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78320/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-78320

• Modeling of belts used as structure. I believe this was done by the RN (starting with the pre-ww1 Town class) and the IJN.
• Some measure of deck area, ship beam, and ship length used up by guns. I suspect that SpringSharp won't raise any red flags over a ship that's 400ft long with 6 centerline-mounted 12in/50 turrets... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (emc) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78320 Sat, 03 May 2008 20:55:43 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/78298/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-78298 A) The belt height should reduce accordingly - or the belt weight should increase for the same height
  B) The deck area should increase and thus - in case an armour deck is selected to lay on the top of the main belt- the armour deck should become much heavier.
  C) The space below water should reduce more.
  
  One... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (delcyros) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/78298 Sat, 03 May 2008 15:35:20 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77165/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-77165
  Mike Garrity ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Michael Garrity) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77165 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:28:06 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77164/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-77164
  Thank you for mentioning gas turbine engines, I had neglected to do so when I posted the message. As for the line drawings I mentioned, my original idea was that Springsharp could produce drawings that would show what the ship looked like as designed, including the location of the various turrets and other above-deck structures.
  
  Mike Garrity ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Michael Garrity) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77164 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:25:22 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77140/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-77140
  What I would like to see would be:
  
  • Better modelling of diesel vs steam machinery
  • Some modelling of learning curve benefits when building multiple units of one design
  Of course, the one thing that I've most desired -- the ability to specify power --... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (emc) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77140 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:29:39 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77112/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html#reply-77112
  My suggestions
  1. A way to choose ship type som the numbers can be adjusted for battleships to destroyers or even FACs.
  2. Missiles in either box, rail och VLS launcher Volumebased system similar to the present torpedosystem, but more detailed.
  3. I like the sensor idea but I'm not sure how it would work out.
  4.... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Psilander) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77112 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:22:13 GMT http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6035/t/Suggestions-for-the-next-version-of-Springsharp.html
  Here are a few items that would prove hugely useful if there is to be a follow-on version of Springsharp:
  
  1) Nuclear Power: the size/weight/volume of the reactor(s) would be determined by their power output and how long the reactor is intended to operate between refuellings
  
  3) Missile Systems: these include but are not limited to cruise missiles, surface-to-air missiles, rolling airframe missiles, etc
  
  4) Radar & ECM systems
  
  5) Vulcan... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Michael Garrity) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6035 Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:22:27 GMT