<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Nagumo surprised during the IO raid </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6033/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 
  
     Polmar in Aircraft Carriers (p193)states:
    
    
    &quot;While the Vals were flying towards Hermes and the Trincomalee bombers were refueling on their carriers 9 RAF twin engined Blenheim bombers
    attacked the carrier Akagi.&quot;
    
     From what i&#39;ve read elsewhere, the Blenheims were actually RCAF and were undetected until after the bombs were falling.
    
    
    What would be the effect of a successful attack on Akagi and possibly some of the other carriers if... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:49:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Nagumo surprised during the IO raid  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77341/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html#reply-77341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If Akagi had been severely damaged or sunk, it is possible that the Japanese would institute some of the measures introduced after Midway, such as fueling and
arming the planes on deck rather than in the hangar, since Akagi would be lost or severely damaged because of the same reason.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Creeping Death1929)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77341</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Nagumo surprised during the IO raid  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77327/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html#reply-77327</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <strong>What would be the effect of a successful attack on Akagi and possibly some of the other carriers if more aircraft had been available?</strong>
<br>
<br>
Ironically, it was probably within Japan&#39;s interests for Akagi to have been damaged in that attack (or even sunk). With 5th Carrier hors-de-combat and
Akagi in the &quot;shop&quot; for months, Yamamoto would probably have had to postpone the Midway operation. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Glenn239)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77327</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Nagumo surprised during the IO raid  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77106/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html#reply-77106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Hello,
<br>
<br>
The Japanese themselves were not pleased with this incident.  (It is also mentioned in many accounts other than Polmar, of course.)  According to Marder nine
(9) RAF Blenheim light bombers from No. 11 Squadron took off at 0840 &amp; located KdB at 1025, &quot;<em>catching the Japanese completely flat-footed even
thought combat air patrols were aloft.  Six bombs burst near the <strong>Akagi</strong>, but caused no damage.  The Zeroes quickly pursued the Blenheims,
shooting... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CA30ist)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77106</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Nagumo surprised during the IO raid  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77103/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html#reply-77103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Regardless of how that engagement turned out, future disaster for the Kido Butai was there for anyone with the wit to see it. That these somewhat pedestrian
aircraft could arrive overhead without being intercepted should have rung some Japanese bells somewhere.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jlyons97)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77103</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:43:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Nagumo surprised during the IO raid  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77080/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html#reply-77080</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Of the British planes available, only torpedo bombers would pose a danger to Nagumo&#39;s ships as high level bombing was too inaccurate. Of the aircraft
available, the Swordfish and Albacore were easy targets for Japanese fighters and the faster Beaufort would still require a fighter escort.
<br>
If the British had more planes, then their chance of hitting the Japanese would rise. It&#39;s unlikely that a bomb hit or two would affect either the Ceylon
operation or the battle of the Coral... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RK)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77080</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:14:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Nagumo surprised during the IO raid  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6033/t/Nagumo-surprised-during-the-IO-raid.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div id="post_message_1646287">
  <div align="left">
     Polmar in Aircraft Carriers (p193)states:
    <br>
    <br>
    <em>&quot;While the Vals were flying towards Hermes and the Trincomalee bombers were refueling on their carriers 9 RAF twin engined Blenheim bombers
    attacked the carrier Akagi.&quot;
    <br>
    <br></em> From what i&#39;ve read elsewhere, the Blenheims were actually RCAF and were undetected until after the bombs were falling.
    <br>
    <br>
    What would be the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PMN1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6033</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>