<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>New Role for HMS Invincible? </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6014/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ &quot;PRINCE William has been given permission to use the aircraft carrier HMS Invincible as a bottle opener at his summer barbecues.


The Prince will install the 194m long, 22,000 tonne vessel in the grounds of Highgrove House, just in time for his 26th birthday party at the end of June.


Once in position, next to the barbecue patio, Invincible will be fitted with a small, standard issue bottle opener on the starboard side, below the water line.


It is the latest military asset to be... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:24:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76995/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76995</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <strong>I must recommend the book Forgotten Voices (the Falklands) some very very interesting facts emerge from those personal accounts</strong>
<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve come across all of those stories before. <em>&#39;Reasons in Writing&#39;</em> goes on at some length about the poor coordination of 5 Brigade, which
is also touched upon in <em>&#39;Amphibious Assault Falklands&#39;</em>. Middlebrook also mentions the poor fitness of the Guards regiments, something which
does not seem to have... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (JNiemczyk)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76995</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76958/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76958</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ People are still interested in the (not so) old girl. She has plenty of life left in her, is being kept well preserved at the moment and all that is lacking is
political backbone (not being specific here as to which government, you fill in the blanks). The fact that this thread is less than serious is probably
disappointing most who view it and were expecting something more exciting... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Obi Wan Russell)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76958</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76954/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76954</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 24586 views and only 5 posts? What&#39;s going on? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (shaun)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76954</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 1942 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76884/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76884</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &quot;Small problem of Argentine nationalist + footage = more crap claiming they sunk a pommy CV during the Falklands...&quot;
<br>
<br>
It&#39;s amazing isn&#39;t it...
<br>
<br>
All the more so because the Norland crew and intelligence officer were taken to Vini the day after she was supposed to be blown to pieces by the brave Argie
pilots. The intelligence officer was walked (unblindfolded) across the deck. Later reporting to his masters all the numbers and types of aircraft Vini was... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (hulahoop7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76884</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:20:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76858/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hey, the USN managed to sink a supercarrier (Google &quot;USS America sunk&quot;) without leaking any embarrassing footage; I would hope the RN could do at
least as well.
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76858</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76855/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76855</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><br>
<br>
Highly entertaining article.</p>

<blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">jock wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I just wonder if the Invincibles final role might not take her to the scrappies!
  <br>
  <br>
  Instead the RN gets the opportunity to test their weaponary on something considerably larger than the frigates previously used. A few lessons also might be
  learnt along the lines of how much punishment a CVS can take (with CVF in mind ) before succumbing ?
</blockquote>

<p>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (chrisRoach)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76855</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:25:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76806/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html#reply-76806</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just wonder if the Invincibles final role might not take her to the scrappies!
<br>
<br>
Instead the RN gets the opportunity to test their weaponary on something considerably larger than the frigates previously used. A few lessons also might be
learnt along the lines of how much punishment a CVS can take (with CVF in mind ) before succumbing ? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jock)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76806</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:53:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New Role for HMS Invincible?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6014/t/New-Role-for-HMS-Invincible-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &quot;PRINCE William has been given permission to use the aircraft carrier HMS Invincible as a bottle opener at his summer barbecues.
<br>
<br>
The Prince will install the 194m long, 22,000 tonne vessel in the grounds of Highgrove House, just in time for his 26th birthday party at the end of June.
<br>
<br>
Once in position, next to the barbecue patio, Invincible will be fitted with a small, standard issue bottle opener on the starboard side, below the water line.
<br>
<br>
It is the latest... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sunk at Narvik)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6014</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>