<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Crusier Modernization.... </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6009/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ any one else excited about how the Bunker Hill type crusiers are gonna look and opertate after they complete modernization...im hella giddy about it ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:36:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77166/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-77166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  Yes, Phalanx 1B is a step forward (but not as good as RAM).
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
True, but the Ticonderogas will be fit with the Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile RIM-162 [ESSM]. ESSM is highly agile and is controled by Aegis. The load out is 8
VLS cells (4 forward, 4 aft) with a four pack in each cell for a total of 32 missiles. All Aegis vessels will employ ESSM in place of RAM. RAM will be fitted
to non-Aegis vessels such as amphibious vessels, aircraft-carriers. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (seasick)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77166</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77158/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-77158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ One problem the Navy is going to have to address is the effect the below minimum ship building rates has had on the shipyards. This seem to be especially true
of the gulf yards. MG has announces delays on LHD-8 because of problems (workmanship) with the ship&#39;s electrical systems. Like problem happen with LPD-17s
and some current destroyers. If we are going to all electric ship we are going to get people who can build them, and that mean building enough ship to keep
them employed full time. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (g lof2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77158</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77114/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-77114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cruiser Modernization? It&#39;s starting to seem more like an extended yard period with a bunch of shipalts.  Yes, Phalanx 1B is a step forward (but not as
good as RAM), and I&#39;m sure the engineers will appreciate an all-electric ship. All US warships should have had all-electric auxiliaries a long time ago.
Steam is a pain in the a$$.
<br>
<br>
XHT1 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (xht1sw)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77114</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:31:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77107/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-77107</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ anything else ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (blark18)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77107</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:59:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77096/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-77096</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m about to turn 27. Yes they are putting new consoles on the cruisers. I&#39;m not sure what they are going to do with the Burkes, from what I&#39;ve
read they are going to definitely going to rip out all the obsolete peripherals for Aegis (as in all the stuff I worked on) and replace it with newer vintage
equipment, but I don&#39;t think they are going to touch CIC. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AegisFC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77096</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/77024/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-77024</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok how old r u i just got out of the marines a year ago? started college it was a weird transiton... r they putting the new digital consuls in the older ships
i read a little how this was gonna happen to the Arleigh Burkes ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (blark18)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/77024</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76927/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76927</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I found my little info in that cursed book &quot;Janes Fighting Ships 2007-2008. LOL!! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sink them All)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76927</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76908/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">blark18 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  OK..congrats Aeigs...what are you doing now?.....I still think it will be intresting to see when they finally slip out of dock...i always loved the
  Ticonderoga class
</blockquote>

<p> I&#39;m starting college this summer.</p>
<br>
As for the Tico&#39;s, last I heard (from an issue of Aegis Lifelines about a year ago), the modifications involve removing all steam operated equipment
(laundry, some of the stuff in the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AegisFC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76908</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:35:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76894/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fair winds and following seas as a civie. Its weird, believe me.
<br>
GUNNER ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gunnersmate04)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76894</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:01:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76873/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76873</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ AegisFC, good luck with your transition to civilian life. Hopefully it will be easier on you than it was for me.
<br>
<br>
XHT1 (still recovering from the Navy) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (xht1sw)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76873</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76847/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ OK..congrats Aeigs...what are you doing now?.....I still think it will be intresting to see when they finally slip out of dock...i always loved the Ticonderoga
class ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (blark18)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76847</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76824/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76824</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ OK, I did some research and I see the gun upgrade is back in. It had been dropped when last I worked with the program three or four years ago.
<br>
<br>
At a guess, the gun house will be left alone -- it&#39;s not like the CGs are stealthy enough for the faceted low-RCS shell to make a real difference. The
combination of rounded gunhouse and Mod 4 ordnance is already at sea in the Danish Absalon class. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76824</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76823/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76823</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have not seen anything recent.
<br>
<br>
Oh, I just have to brag... I&#39;m now a civvy! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AegisFC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76823</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76822/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76822</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Does somebody have a news article or somthing else about this?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (seasick)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76822</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:10:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76805/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76805</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>All 22 Ticos were to receive 5&quot;/62 cal. guns &amp; upgrade Phalanx to Block 1B standard. Don&#39;t know if it went ahead but they were to receive the
new guns. Don&#39;t know about the new gunhouses - look cool on Burke IIA ships. What&#39;s the mag capacity for the 5&quot; on Ticos?</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sink them All)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76805</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76793/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76793</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My understanding is that gun modernization was abandoned long ago.  They will have the same 5-inch/54s they have now.. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76793</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76768/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76768</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What is the extent of the refit of the main cannon&#39;s gonna be will they replace the entire turret with a facted design or just the barreal of the 5in
cannon ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (blark18)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76768</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76756/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76756</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You will see the IR detectors on the sides of the phalanx if you look close enough. Also inside the white ball where the SPQ-9A was will be the SPQ-9B, if its
back lit just right you will see it. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (seasick)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76756</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76752/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html#reply-76752</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They are going to look the same. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AegisFC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76752</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Crusier Modernization....  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6009/t/Crusier-Modernization-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ any one else excited about how the Bunker Hill type crusiers are gonna look and opertate after they complete modernization...im hella giddy about it<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/eek.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (blark18)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/6009</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>