<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Questions on CIWS </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5978/t/Questions-on-CIWS.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ General question about these smaller-calibre guns which may or may not bear implication on UK procurement for the RN&#39;s future vessels...


Several on the market; the USN are using Mk110 57mm for their new Zumwalt class &#39;destroyers&#39;, the OTO Melara 76mm is in widespread use in many navies
as a dual-use anti-ship and anti-air system, SeaRAM seems to be the choice of arms for some USN and German Navy vessels, we&#39;re still using Phalanx on ours
and quad-packed CAAM may offer some... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:17:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Questions on CIWS  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76528/t/Questions-on-CIWS.html#reply-76528</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Re Daring CIWS. The infamous &quot;fitted for but not with&quot; applies. The would be position roughly abreast the for funnel when and if fitted, if you look
at overhead photos, there appears to be two plinths in these positions.
<br>
<br>
Regards ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Practica)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76528</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Questions on CIWS  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/76526/t/Questions-on-CIWS.html#reply-76526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Daring doesn&#39;t seem to have a Phalanx CIWS - just the usual 30mm mount port and starboard - any reason for this? Where would it go if it were to be fitted? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Colin Mc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/76526</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Questions on CIWS  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5978/t/Questions-on-CIWS.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ General question about these smaller-calibre guns which may or may not bear implication on UK procurement for the RN&#39;s future vessels...
<br>
<br>
Several on the market; the USN are using Mk110 57mm for their new Zumwalt class &#39;destroyers&#39;, the OTO Melara 76mm is in widespread use in many navies
as a dual-use anti-ship and anti-air system, SeaRAM seems to be the choice of arms for some USN and German Navy vessels, we&#39;re still using Phalanx on ours
and quad-packed CAAM may... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (shaun)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5978</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>