Rolls Royce Goshawk engine http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5866/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:37:13 GMT Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:19:45 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5866/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Rolls Royce Goshawk engine ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/75161/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html#reply-75161 NewGolconda wrote:
Wieght saving? I read drag savings.

Around 1930, cooling drag was a major draw back of the in line watercooled engine. RR hoped that steam cooling, with its condensor, would elliminate pr significantly reduce coolling drag.

As it turns out, advances in radiator design, flowing through from the auto makers, presserised glycol cooling, and the design of adjustable, and later low... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (PMN1) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/75161 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:19:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Rolls Royce Goshawk engine ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/75075/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html#reply-75075
Around 1930, cooling drag was a major draw back of the in line watercooled engine. RR hoped that steam cooling, with its condensor, would elliminate pr significantly reduce coolling drag.

As it turns out, advances in radiator design, flowing through from the auto makers, presserised glycol cooling, and the design of adjustable, and later low drag radiator mountings that actually generated thrust from the flow of waste heat were designed,... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (NewGolconda) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/75075 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:07:37 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Rolls Royce Goshawk engine ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/75058/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html#reply-75058 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (PMN1) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/75058 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:11:19 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Rolls Royce Goshawk engine ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/75057/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html#reply-75057
The F405 (both -400 & -401) is 1,306 lb.

At least according to Jane's and this site: http://www.jet-engine.net/miltfspec.html ]]> feeds@yuku.com (bager1968) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/75057 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:06:53 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Rolls Royce Goshawk engine ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/75050/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html#reply-75050 feeds@yuku.com (BenRoethig) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/75050 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:17:44 GMT <![CDATA[ Rolls Royce Goshawk engine ]]> http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5866/t/Rolls-Royce-Goshawk-engine.html ]]> feeds@yuku.com (PMN1) http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5866 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:37:13 GMT