<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Economical Standard Frigate, 2005 </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5802/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[  Basic concept was to come up with a frigate capable of operating in say, the Persian Gulf, that would be economical and a simple ship, and she is similar
in apperance to the Oliver Hazard Perry class FFGs, but different in some ways. Her armament consists of an OTO Melara 3&quot; gun forward, and two Bushmaster
25mm cannons aft for gun armament, while two quad launchers in &quot;B&quot; position, with either MM38 Exocet or the lightweight version of Harpoon being
used. Finally, there is a... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:12:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/75471/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-75471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ An economical frigate?  I thought that was already done and goes by the name of MEKO. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mark F)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/75471</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:12:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/74904/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-74904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii22/psilander/stanndard.gif" alt="image">
<br>
My suggestion.
<br>
Shortend Tawianese La Fayette armed with Harpoon SSM/ SLAM, 127mm OTO breda, goalkeeper and 4x2 cell vls for ESSM (32 missiles) and 2x 27mm Mauser guns.</p>

<p>Surf( airsearch radar is Ericson AMB, gun control is a Ericson Cersos gunsight, flank arrays for FC to ESSMs</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Psilander)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/74904</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/74369/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-74369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Isn&#39;t that a contradiction? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dave Bender)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/74369</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:47:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/74352/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-74352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have to agree with Psilander, Aegis itself is quite expensive and since the projected ship lacks SAM capacity, appart from point defence, it is doubtfull the
system has any function at all. Only the inclusion of SM-1 or so would justify Aegis. Since that is not the case, it can be abbandoned.
<br>
<br>
In general concept, the propposed vessel may look very simmilar to the already available Type-23 frigate of the Royal Navy and the German Brandenburg Class.
Both do however have slighly... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (E F Draaijers)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/74352</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:03:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/74304/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-74304</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Why use the AEGIS, isn&#39;t both quite old, expensive and to complex for a &quot;budget ship&quot;.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;d go with either Ericsom Giraffe AMB or a similar radar and CEROS FC which also can control ESSM (used in the RAN). for C2I system i&#39;d buy a good one
but not to complex to keep the costs down. C2I and sensors are the most expensive things on ships and for a buget escort AGEIS is just to much. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Psilander)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/74304</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/74302/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-74302</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  If you want to leave out radar-guided SAMs, you can drop AEGIS/SPY-1 and use one of the rotating phased arrays used in LCS and other low-end combatants
  (TRS-3D, Sea Giraffe AMB, MRR, etc.) Those are a much more economical match to a RAM-based air-defense suite. If you&#39;re relying on RAM, install two
  launchers (perhaps Sea RAM) for redundancy.
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Went without the AEGIS (since I don&#39;t have anything other than Harpoons/Exocets and RAMs anyways) and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/74302</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/74299/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html#reply-74299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Joshua Kintner wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <p>Basic concept was to come up with a frigate capable of operating in say, the Persian Gulf, that would be economical and a simple ship, and she is similar
  in apperance to the Oliver Hazard Perry class FFGs, but different in some ways. Her armament consists of an OTO Melara 3&quot; gun forward, and two
  Bushmaster 25mm cannons aft for gun armament, while two quad launchers in &quot;B&quot; position, with... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (taschoene)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/74299</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:58:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Economical Standard Frigate, 2005  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5802/t/Economical-Standard-Frigate-2005.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p> Basic concept was to come up with a frigate capable of operating in say, the Persian Gulf, that would be economical and a simple ship, and she is similar
in apperance to the Oliver Hazard Perry class FFGs, but different in some ways. Her armament consists of an OTO Melara 3&quot; gun forward, and two Bushmaster
25mm cannons aft for gun armament, while two quad launchers in &quot;B&quot; position, with either MM38 Exocet or the lightweight version of Harpoon being
used. Finally, there is a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5802</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>