<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5382/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ From Aus Aviation; 04/02/08


SEASPRITE FACES AXE…AGAIN: Word out of last week&#39;s PAC 08 naval exposition and
sea power conference in Sydney suggests the Navy&#39;s ailing Seasprite

program is again facing the axe, this time one wielded by new Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon.
The minister identified Seasprite as one of two examples of
troubled programs currently under review during a January 29 media doorstop. Industry officials later confirmed that both Sikorsky and Eurocopter were... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:12:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73339/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73339</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yeah, its the F model alright, which I believe is more suited to the attack role, just like the F-111s. We&#39;re not replacing the regular fighters after all.
<br>
<br>
EDIT: I should have said, better because of the second crewman. There are no other differences I&#39;m aware of.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rabid stoat AUS)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73339</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73335/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Freedom Eagle, I was not aware that we we buying only 2 seat Super Hornets. Fs as opposed to a mix of Fs and Gs.
<br>
<br>
Jonathan ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (JBG)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73335</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73197/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks pascaly and Milne Bay. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Freedom Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73197</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73167/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You may be able to get one from the Temora Aviation Museum
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.aviationmuseum.com.au/">http://www.aviationmuseum.com.au/</a>
<br>
Fighter World at Williamtown NSW or the Australian War Museum Shop in Canberra may be able to help.
<br>
Regards
<br>
MB ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Milne Bay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73167</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73146/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Freedom Eagle wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Does anyone know where I can get the DVD on the RAAF F-111s?
</blockquote>

<p> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.f-111.net/movies.htm">http://www.f-111.net/movies.htm</a>
<br>
<br>
Try here.  I can&#39;t vouch for their quality, but they may be worth a shot.   Not sure about the region coding.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pascaly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73146</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73124/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Does anyone know where I can get the DVD on the RAAF F-111s? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Freedom Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73124</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:43:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/73045/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-73045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Freedom Eagle wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I hate to see the Aardvark go as it one of my favorite all time aircraft.
</blockquote>

<p> Sorry to drag this further OT, but as many times as I&#39;ve seen a dump and burn by a pig (the RAAF name for the one-eleven), I know the last one I see,
I&#39;m going to remember.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pascaly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/73045</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72939/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I guess I should have stated F-18F, because I believe that is the correct model the RAAF is purchasing. Maybe in the future a couple of F-18Gs could be
purchased for SEAD roles. I think US aicraft designers jumped the gun in building only single seat fighter aircraft as the US Marines purshased many of their
Hornets in the 2 seat form as the F-18D to use as replacements for the A-6 Intruder as it was realised the high workload in the attack mission would be easier
with a 2 crew. The Superbug... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Freedom Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72939</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72718/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think two things were factors. One is the commonality of the design with the earlier F/A-18A/B/C/D series, in terms of layout and operating systems.
Supposedly it is very easy for pilots to convert between the Bug generations, I am not so sure that it would be the same with the F-15E. The other part would
seem that this is intended as a bridging capability, the intention being that when the F-35 is fully in service, the F/A-18Es can be sold off. Whether this is
to the USN or another... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Michael ODonnell)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72718</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72671/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72671</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Im curious why the F-15E wasnt bought. The Superbug (F-18E) has a much smaller radar signature (about the size of an F-16) and has some in common with first
generation Hornets. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Freedom Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72671</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72525/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72525</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Despite the obvious negatives the decision to axe the Sea Sprites just had to be made. The crucial issue was airworthiness. In auto hover they would
unexpectantly pitch. Kaman, after over a billion A$ spent wanted another A$40 million to fix what should have been a basic issue sorted out years ago.
<br>
<br>
Upgraded Seahawks are usuable but we don&#39;t have enough for Adelaides, Anzacs and training. Best bet would be to cadge a few from the USN. Second, and
better longer term bet is to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (JBG)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72525</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72482/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In a word, NO. They have no idea where they are going with Defence. They do know that they would like to claw back some billions from somewhere so that the
Reserve Bank will stop increasing interest rates. Alternatively, they want to be seen to be looking after their constituency if interest rates have to keep
rising because of the previous government&#39;s profligacy.
<br>
<br>
On the other hand they do not want to actually do anything serious about interest rates because that would reduce... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jim3au)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72482</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72387/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72387</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ While Labor might be happy to dump it and wash it&#39;s hands of it, that still doesn&#39;t solve the actual problem, that of the helicopters for the ANZAC
Frigates and future RAN ships. While the RAN would not have been happy about the delays to the Seasprites, they would also surely be unhappy about having to
keep going with the minimal number of ageing, almost obsolescent Seahawks. And without (now) a definite replacement plan. The Axeman is making political
mileage by dumping on past or... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Michael ODonnell)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72387</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 03:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72355/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72355</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">If the RAN cannot get someone to say, make that several someones, to say that the aircraft are good, safe weapons
systems to fly, then they cannot do anything but axe them.
<br>
<br>
A part from the quandary of whether another five hundred million or whatever, will make it better, or will it then change from becoming a Coalition fiasco to a
Labor fiasco, there is the very real issue of whether or not they are safe. Presently, it is a Coalition fiasco... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jim3au)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72355</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72301/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ So it&#39;s happened at last - no more speculation. Fitzgibbon says the programme will be replaced by an extended upgrade of the existing Seahawk fleet. Now
that he&#39;s cut his teeth on this relatively simple task, what is the next target for Joel the Axeman?
<br>
<br>
Cheers, Cliff                    
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CliffS)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72301</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72299/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;ve heard the new minister backing down re the SHornets lately. It seems likely it will still go ahead. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rabid stoat AUS)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72299</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72298/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Looking at what is available there is only really options with either more ex USN Seahawks or ex RN Lynx&#39;s.  How do the respective services stand with say
12 of these in reasonable condition that the RAN could lease for a few years until we can get a new order in place?  Commonality I&#39;d push for the Seahawks,
versatility the Lynx................... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sons of anzac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72298</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72278/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72278</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I dunno- I beginning to get somewhat confident they will survive.  We are hearing more comments from RAAF that they want them, the F111&#39;s have had it and
the f35 program is just too uncertaina s yet and they are nervous of the capability gap.  I think it will get down to the asrgument between the strategic
theorists ie Dibb, Kopp and White vs the RAAF.  Whilst the new govt seems determined to denegrate everything the previous conservative govt did (or did not)
do, I think it would be a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sons of anzac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72278</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72274/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72274</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The next to go will be the Super Hornets. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pascaly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72274</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/72272/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html#reply-72272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, the govt has finally axed the project.  1 down, how many more to go?????????????????????  I hope they can lease or buy some replacement helicopters in
the interim until the follow on replacement decision is made. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sons of anzac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/72272</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ SeaSprite Faces Axe...Again  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5382/t/SeaSprite-Faces-Axe-Again.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial" color="#003366"><font color="#000" size="2">From Aus Aviation; 04/02/08
<br></font>
<br>
<strong>SEASPRITE FACES AXE…AGAIN:</strong></font> <span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Word out of last week&#39;s PAC 08 naval exposition and
sea power conference in Sydney suggests the Navy&#39;s ailing <span class="EC_SpellE">Seasprite</span>
<br>
program is again facing the axe, this time one wielded by new Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon.
<br></span><span... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pascaly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5382</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>