<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>MV Triton in the news... </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5308/t/MV-Triton-in-the-news-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I must say this is all a big mess. We need to operate these large, seaworthy ships for border protection, but why to they have to
be leased vessels with commercial crews, offshore refitting and small customs parties?


Lets bite the bullet, order the ships we need for this role and man them with servants of the crown!



Sacked seamen fight for jobs


  
    

    
      
        
        
    
  



  

  
    

    
      
        
          Font Size: Decrease Increase

          Print... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:54:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: MV Triton in the news...  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/68347/t/MV-Triton-in-the-news-.html#reply-68347</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">pascaly wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  a push for a coast guard? Labor have been quiet on it lately, but this could be a nice little catalyst. Talk about protecting Australia and her workers etc,
  plus a few orders with Austal for a few more Armidales. Coast Watch stuff could be then contracted under the coast guard which would pick up AMSA and AusSAR
  or whoever. Not saying I&#39;m for it, but just a feeling I get.
</blockquote>

<p> </p>I think... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CliffS)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/68347</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: MV Triton in the news...  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/68295/t/MV-Triton-in-the-news-.html#reply-68295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ a push for a coast guard?  Labor have been quiet on it lately, but this could be a nice little catalyst.  Talk about protecting Australia and her workers etc,
plus a few orders with Austal for a few more Armidales.  Coast Watch stuff could be then contracted under the coast guard which would pick up AMSA and AusSAR
or whoever.  Not saying I&#39;m for it, but just a feeling I get. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pascaly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/68295</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:48:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ MV Triton in the news...  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5308/t/MV-Triton-in-the-news-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <h1 class="section-heading">I must say this is all a big mess. We need to operate these large, seaworthy ships for border protection, but why to they have to
be leased vessels with commercial crews, offshore refitting and small customs parties?
<br>
<br>
Lets bite the bullet, order the ships we need for this role and man them with servants of the crown!
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sacked seamen fight for jobs</h1>

<div id="section-header-ads">
  <div class="ad">
    

    <div class="section-sponsor">... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NewGolconda)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5308</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>