<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Royal Navy minor news thread </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5178/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I thought I&#39;d create a thread for everything perhaps not quite worthy of its own thread.


The Royal Navy is taking command of NATO Mine Countermeasures Group 1.


Link.

http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.11260/changeNav/6568


HMS Bulwark assumes Fleet Flagship duties.


Link.

http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.11257/changeNav/6568


HMS Manchester sails from Sicily to rejoin USS Harry Truman.


Link.... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:38:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/85529/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-85529</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cardigan Bay, Largs Bay, Lyme Bay, Mounts Bay and Argus will be refitted by A &amp; P group after they won a ministry of defence contract.
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ap-group.co.uk/APGroup/News.html">http://www.ap-group.co.uk/APGroup/News.html</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (reiverman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/85529</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83901/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-83901</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7448214.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7448214.stm</a>
<br>
<br>
<strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">Portsmouth gains in naval carrier deals</span></strong>
<br>
<br>
Putting together what is in effect the largest jig-saw puzzle ever made in Europe is not an easy task.
<br>
<br>
The two most expensive Royal Navy ships yet - HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales - will be partly built in Portsmouth, before... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perfectgeneral)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83901</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83680/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-83680</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83680</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83592/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-83592</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m just saying I agree with you<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/wink.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kev 99a)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83592</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:33:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83522/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-83522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83522</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:41:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83464/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-83464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I actually posted this on the what the RN needs thread. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kev 99a)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83464</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/83419/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-83419</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ First Launch of the IDAS Missile System from a Submerged Submarine
<br>
<br>
(Source: Bundesamt fur Wehrtechnik und Beschaffung; issued June 16, 2008)
<br>
<br>
On 29 May 2008, the fiber optic IDAS guided missile (IDAS = Interactive Defence and Attack System for Submarines) was launched for the first time from a
submerged submarine. The missile was successfully launched by U33, a class U212A submarine for a test flight over the Western Baltic Sea.
<br>
<br>
After a boresight of the inertial... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/83419</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/82795/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-82795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ BMT completes RFA Argus study
<br>
12-Jun-2008
<br>
<br>
BMT Defence Services Ltd, a subsidiary of BMT Group Ltd, has completed a study of safety issues to determine feasible options for implementation during the
planned 2008 refit of RFA ARGUS.
<br>
<br>
The Aviation Training Ship, RFA ARGUS has a secondary role as the primary casualty receiving facility.
<br>
<br>
The MOD&#39;s Royal Fleet Auxiliary Service (RFAS) Integrated Project Team, now Afloat Support Directorate, commissioned the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kev 99a)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/82795</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/82784/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-82784</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The F-35B has made its first flight, with a British pilot at the controls: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004240.html?wh=wh">http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004240.html?wh=wh</a> From Lockheed Martin: With test pilot Graham Tomlinson at the controls, the short
takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] F-35B Lightning II streaked into blue Texas skies Wednesday, marking the first flight of an
aircraft that will provide a combination of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Alexius55)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/82784</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/82471/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-82471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ UKPAAMS has just completed its first successful test firing:
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  A new Royal Navy air defence missile has been successfully tested in the Mediterranean.
  <br>
  <br>
  The Principals Anti-Air Missile System (PAAMS) launched a missile at over 3,045mph off the French coast on June 4th and hit a target simulating an aircraft
  travelling at 450mph and at an altitude of 10km.
  <br>
  <br>
  The new system has been developed to allow the Type 45 Destroyer to defend a fleet... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kev 99a)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/82471</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/81064/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-81064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div id="ArticleInfoHolder">
  <div id="ArticleInfoDate">
    <div id="ArticleInfoHolder">
      <div id="ArticleInfoDate">
        <span class="noindex">DATE:<span class="information">29/05/08</span></span>
      </div>

      <div id="ArticleInfoSource">
        SOURCE:<span class="information">Flight Daily News
        <br>
        <br></span>
      </div>
    </div>

    <div id="ArticleHeading">
      ILA 2008: Typhoon Tranche 3 decisions loom - Britain and Italy may reduce numbers... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/81064</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80089/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-80089</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I thought that snippet was interesting too.
<br>
<br>
It gives a bit of insight into how the MOD is thinking long term. Particularly how the F35, Typhoon fit together.
<br>
<br>
There was talk at one point of the UK buying a mix of F35bs and a&#39;s in order to provide carrier and long range strike profiles. With cash being tight, and
being stuck with tranche 3, maybe the MOD wants to turn tranche 3 into the long range strike element?
<br>
<br>
The compromise meaning the UK doesn&#39;t buy as... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (hulahoop7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80089</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/80088/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-80088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I thought that snippet was interesting too.
<br>
<br>
It gives a bit of insight into how the MOD is thinking long term. Particularly how the F35, Typhoon fit together.
<br>
<br>
There was talk at one point of the UK buying a mix of F35bs and a&#39;s in order to provide carrier and long range strike profiles. With cash being tight, and
being stuck with tranche 3, maybe the MOD wants to turn tranche 3 into the long range strike element?
<br>
<br>
The compromise meaning the UK doesn&#39;t buy as... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (hulahoop7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/80088</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79745/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ On the face of it yes, but it may impact on JSF, with the shortage of funding. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79745</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:14:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79741/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This has nothing to do with the Royal Navy. Did you mistake this for an aviation message board and thread?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perfectgeneral)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79741</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 00:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79723/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Conformal fuel tanks and other enhancements to extend the strike range of its Eurofighter Typhoon combat aircraft are emerging as requirements for the UK Royal
Air Force (RAF). The service&#39;s aspirations for future development of the Typhoon are being addressed in discussions with the Eurofighter consortium,
according to BAE Systems executives
<br>
<br>
[first posted to http://jdw.janes.com - 09 May 2008]
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Anthony58)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79723</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79500/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79500</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Agreed Sunk. <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rob)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79500</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79496/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79496</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I &#39;m fairly sure the original blurb about Orion 08 mentioned visits further east than the Indian Ocean- Asia and Australia? Its disappointing that the Govt
can&#39;t see the value in such visits. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sunk at Narvik)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79496</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79398/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79398</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Red arrows have gave Illustrious a fly over display while she was on her way to Cyprus for Logistics stop. I can hardly believe her deployment is nearly
over already. Mind you she did leave on the 21 of January and came back again and left again and came back again and left again.<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/roll.gif" alt="image"> I feel like a permanent deployed task force in the Indian ocean would be a
really valuable asset for the UK to have. I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (F35B)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79398</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/79395/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html#reply-79395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ HMS Westminster heads for Burma
<br>
<br>
<br>
HMS Westminster has been deployed towards Burma (Myanmar) at the request of the Department for International Development. The Royal Navy Frigate, with a crew
of 198 men and women has been deployed to waters offshore Burma as a contingency measure. She has not yet been formally tasked, but will be in a position to
assist aid efforts if required. Her onboard facilities which could be of use include communications equipment, a medical officer and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (F35B)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/79395</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Royal Navy minor news thread  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5178/t/Royal-Navy-minor-news-thread.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I thought I&#39;d create a thread for everything perhaps not quite worthy of its own thread.
<br>
<br>
The Royal Navy is taking command of NATO Mine Countermeasures Group 1.
<br>
<br>
Link.
<br>
http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.11260/changeNav/6568
<br>
<br>
HMS Bulwark assumes Fleet Flagship duties.
<br>
<br>
Link.
<br>
http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.11257/changeNav/6568
<br>
<br>
HMS Manchester sails from Sicily to rejoin USS Harry Truman.
<br>
<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rob)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5178</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>