<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>US-designed submarines for South Africa in 1963 </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/4106/t/US-designed-submarines-for-South-Africa-in-1963.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I found two interesting 1963 memorandums about the possible sale of US-built diesel-electric submarines
for South Africa.


In March 1963 the South African Navy chief informally asked US naval attache in South Africa if the US would be willing to design and build two or three
1,700-ton submarines for South Africa. Secretary of State Dean Rusk suggested the US government should give a favorable response and according to the second
memorandum, the US Navy got ELCO to design &quot;a smaller,... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:26:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: US-designed submarines for South Africa in 1963  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/52667/t/US-designed-submarines-for-South-Africa-in-1963.html#reply-52667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Precisely why the second design was &quot;a smaller, cheaper submarine which the Navy got ELCO to design expressly to meet South African needs&quot;.
<br>
<br>
The first was &quot;about 1700 tons&quot;... the same size as the Barbels. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bager1968)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/52667</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:26:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: US-designed submarines for South Africa in 1963  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/52647/t/US-designed-submarines-for-South-Africa-in-1963.html#reply-52647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Barbels were running at double the price of Oberons at the time.
<br>
<br>
Kevin ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drunknsubmrnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/52647</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: US-designed submarines for South Africa in 1963  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/52391/t/US-designed-submarines-for-South-Africa-in-1963.html#reply-52391</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sounds like they were talking about the 3-sub Barbel class as the basis for the Sud Afrika design.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Barbel_%28SS-580%29">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Barbel_%28SS-580%29</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bager1968)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/sreply/52391</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ US-designed submarines for South Africa in 1963  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/4106/t/US-designed-submarines-for-South-Africa-in-1963.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span class="postbody"><font size="2"><font size="3">I found two interesting 1963 memorandums about the possible sale of US-built diesel-electric submarines
for South Africa.
<br>
<br>
In March 1963 the South African Navy chief informally asked US naval attache in South Africa if the US would be willing to design and build two or three
1,700-ton submarines for South Africa. Secretary of State Dean Rusk suggested the US government should give a favorable response and according to the second... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (becksh)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/4106</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>