<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17935/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 



Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier





&nbsp;(Source: Chosun Ilbo; published Sept. 15, 2011)&nbsp; &nbsp; 






Japan operates two helicopter carriers, but now plans to buy a bigger ship, displacing about 19,500 tonnes and carrying 14 helicopters. (JMSDF photo)TOKYO --- Japan plans to build a 19,500-ton aircraft carrier capable of housing helicopters after China launched its first own aircraft carrier, Chinese media reported on Wednesday. Japan already has two... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:06:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/252906/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-252906</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ triring65 wrote:

Some people really don't understand metallurgy and physics.With the down wash of the F-35B burners pointed directly on the surface, without heat protection it will stretch the steel due to heating. Since the heating is localized the su...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/252906/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-252906">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pfcem)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/252906</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:14:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251796/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ triring65 wrote:Some people really don't understand metallurgy and physics.&nbsp;With the down wash of the F-35B burners pointed directly on the surface, without heat protection it will stretch the steel due to heating.&nbsp;It lands in dry thrust, not af...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251796/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251796">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251796</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:32:21 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251745/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ triring65 wrote:Some people really don't understand metallurgy and physics.Like the people who designed &amp; built both the aircraft and the ships... along with the people who maintain &amp; repair the ships?Really?triring65 wrote:With
 the down wash of...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251745/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251745">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bager1968)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251745</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:53:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251725/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Instead of lightning, they could locally be called "Duck Tails" or "Mallards". The burner when pivoting/swinging (does it swing side-to-side?) remind me of ducks waddling along. (Now, if the plane had duck sound-makers....)

On the F-22, the 4 look mech...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251725/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251725">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (daetaku)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251725</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:46:07 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251589/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251589</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Watched daetaku's ads. We can't get them soon enough. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jim3au)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251589</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:57:54 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251572/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ bager1968 wrote:
Re: F-35B exhaust exaggerations again.

Shall we quote from the recent F-35B shipboard trials that have been extensively covered in the Aircraft Carriers section of this board to maybe put this bullshit to rest finally?


http://www...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251572/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251572">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (triring65)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251572</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:43:31 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251502/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251502</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ F-35B recap/refresher

F-35B - Taking STOVL to a New Level 

https://www.youtube.com/w...J1KksHUQ&feature=related
Uploaded by LockheedMartinVideos on Apr 16, 2010


---------------
F-35 C Cat Launch:

First F-35C catapult launch
https://www.yo...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251502/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251502">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (daetaku)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251502</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:05:29 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251497/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251497</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fred the Great wrote:Neither Spain nor Italy need to spend any money on F-35B for a few years. They may be in a better situation by then.Certainly we hope they're in a better position by then!You're right . . . There is time for their economies to turn ar...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251497/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251497">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (daetaku)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251497</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:42:02 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251494/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251494</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ "http://www.marinecorpstim...ates-f35b-at-sea-101811/

    Cordell said that one piece of good news is that the “outflow” from the jet’s exhaust while hovering is less intense than expected. “It’s counterintuitive, but the jet has a less harsh...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251494/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251494">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (daetaku)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251494</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:30:11 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251490/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251490</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ triring65 wrote:There is another flaw within your refute, most all large deck amphibious ships are not designed in accepting extreme heat variation resulting from the jet exhaust from constantly landing of the F-35B on the deck and will require major retr...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251490/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251490">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bager1968)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251490</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:54:11 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251163/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251163</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I'm not quite sure how we got on to the USMC and the Osprey, the EFV and the F-35B but it is hardly earth-shattering to say the Marines have had to fight for all three, suffering a partial loss on the first, a complete loss on the second and a slight setb...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251163/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251163">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Fred the Great)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251163</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:48:07 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251145/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251145</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fred the Great wrote:I'm a little surprised Italy would want 50. I'd be even more surprised if that happens, but we'll see.   The original plan was for fewer. The navy was going to get F-35B, the air force F-35A. Then the AF decided it would like a split ...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251145/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251145">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251145</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:12:21 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251130/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Wiki is hardly an authorative source.&nbsp; Much of what is in there is just the person who wrote the articles opinion. No fact checking or authentication of the expertise of the writer is done.&nbsp; Yup triring65, there is also serious doubt about the a...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251130/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251130">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OSCSSW)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251130</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:51:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251124/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Neither Spain nor Italy need to spend any money on F-35B for a few years. They may be in a better situation by then.Certainly we hope they're in a better position by then!You're right . . . There is time for their economies to turn around and in any case ...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251124/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251124">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Fred the Great)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251124</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:59 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251123/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251123</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fred the Great wrote:Other than the USMC, the likely operators of the F-35B - until recently - were the UK, Spain and Italy. The first of these has turned its mind elsewhere, while, as you say, the economic troubles of Europe may cause some to rethink suc...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251123/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251123">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bledlow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251123</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:12:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251119/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ OSCSSW wrote:"Jua makes the point that there are three controversial projects that are integral to the Marines - the F-35B, the AAV and the Osprey. All are rather expensive. No doubt the Marines are having to fight many a rear-guard action to keep all thr...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251119/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251119">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (triring65)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251119</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:47:49 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251114/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ "Jua makes the point that there are three controversial projects that are integral to the Marines - the F-35B, the AAV and the Osprey. All are rather expensive. No doubt the Marines are having to fight many a rear-guard action to keep all three."So scribb...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251114/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251114">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OSCSSW)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251114</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:31:41 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251112/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Other than the USMC, the likely operators of the F-35B - until recently - were the UK, Spain and Italy. The first of these has turned its mind elsewhere, while, as you say, the economic troubles of Europe may cause some to rethink such expensive and diffi...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251112/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251112">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Fred the Great)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251112</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:53:12 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251025/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ triring65 wrote:It seems as if this debate itself is becoming irrelevant when the US is considering to slash the JSF F-35 program itself and even if it was continued the B variant would no doubt be cut since, 1. the USMC had obtained 75 British Sea Harrie...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251025/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-251025">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OSCSSW)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/251025</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:41:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/250934/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-250934</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The US is not "considering to slash the JSF F-35 program", if the super committee fails to agree to a deal on $1.2 billion in Federal budget savings, automatic cuts go into effect that cut $600 billion from defense spending (this is IN ADDITION TO ~$400 b...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/250934/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier#reply-250934">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pfcem)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/250934</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:01:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17935/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Japan to Build New Helicopter Carrier





&nbsp;(Source: Chosun Ilbo; published Sept. 15, 2011)&nbsp; &nbsp; 






Japan operates two helicopter carriers, but now plans to buy a bigger ship, displacing about 19,500 tonnes and carryi...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17935/Japan-to-Build-New-Helicopter-Carrier">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sandyj)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17935</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:48:41 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
