<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Canada to announce restoration of&quot;Royal&quot;to Navy and AF </title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17650/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Goodbye Marcom and Aircom?

This from the Halifax paper:

Quote
The Canadian military is returning to its roots.On Tuesday, National Defence Minister Peter Mackay is expected to announce the restoration of the Royal designation of the navy and air force branches of the Canadian Forces at CFB Halifax.Sources say the branches are expected to be renamed the Royal Canadian Navy, replacing Maritime Command, and the Royal Canadian Air Force. The army, which has many royal titles in its... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:13:51 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:03:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/245571/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-245571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I am not sure if building more ships will help capabilities or not.  Hasn't it been on the news that they are having to idle ships for lack of crews?
With the current defence review, it shows the the forces are heavy on chiefs both military and civilian....<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/245571/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-245571">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Spud)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/245571</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:03:00 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/245532/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-245532</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have to ask what that might achieve?  Like it or not Afghanistan is where it's at, even if we are planning to run away and let it collapse back to bad enough to launch raids on our home bases. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ChrisPat)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/245532</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:27:41 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237825/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237825</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ True, especially since they're likely not going to be deployed again overseas for a long time, if ever.   I can't help imagining the improvements to the RCN and RCAF that could have been made if the estimated $11 billion dollars spent on the Afghan missio...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237825/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237825">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Admiral Beez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237825</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:21:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237810/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Getting new tanks was not necessarily a Good Thing. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drunknsubmrnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237810</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:23:41 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237809/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ At least one benefit of the Afghan mission is that the CAF got new tanks.   Had we not gone to Afghanistan I imagine we'd have scrapped the Leo Is and replaced them with Striker or other lesser AFV. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Admiral Beez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237809</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:01:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237773/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237773</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Admiral Beez wrote:How are the Leo IIs getting back from Afghanistan?.It seems they'll be flown out buy leased AN-124 this fall. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dave AAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237773</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:02:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237721/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Leo 2's there now are the last of our 2A6's. They won't be left.

Dunno about the Leo 1's. They're pretty mass-intensive to bring back as scrap. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drunknsubmrnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237721</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:42:39 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237700/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It wouldn't surprise me if they left some, most or all of the Leo IIs behind for the new Afghan army.  Assuming all the Leo IIs come home, what about the 15 Leo Is we shipped to Afghanistan earlier?   What is their fate? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Admiral Beez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237700</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:31:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237684/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They're scrambling on that now. We have no way of repatriating them by CF (now RCAF) air, and the ground route has issues. 

There is a government shipbuilding strategy. It involves major (read larger) expenditures at the same time as the F-35 purchase,...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237684/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237684">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drunknsubmrnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237684</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:38:37 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237679/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237679</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ How are the Leo IIs getting back from Afghanistan?

I'd like to see the new RCN benefit from a new longterm warship building strategy - slow build 1-2 ships each year, plus making real efforts to sell ships abroad. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Admiral Beez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237679</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:01:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237651/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ -4 C-17 realistically means 2 ready to fly any day you choose, and usually 3. Each Globemaster has the utility of ~4 HercIt means 2.1 aircraft ready to fly for about 10 hours/day at most. At the range we usually use them for, we're looking at carrying a -...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237651/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237651">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drunknsubmrnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237651</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:26:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237644/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237644</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Semantically, I'd ask for how one goes about defining 'token'.
-4 C-17 realistically means 2 ready to fly any day you choose, and usually 3. Each Globemaster has the utility of ~4 Herc
-17 J-Herc... making Canada's order the 4th largest after only the U...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237644/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237644">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jim WH)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237644</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:17:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237624/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237624</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ FELEX is concerned with industrial support, not capabilities. A post-FELEX ship will have pretty much the same capabilities as the current ones, they should just be more serviceable.

The new gear the Harper government brought in has been ordered in tok...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237624/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237624">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drunknsubmrnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237624</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:43:58 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237608/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In fairness, the CH-148 were ordered by the previous government. Against which they fart-arsed around for about half a decade on that front.

But yeah, the current mob aren't perfect, but they do seem better than their predecessors. The shortlist of equ...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237608/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237608">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jim WH)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237608</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:14:39 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237607/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ FELIX looks allright, so do the helicopters. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NewGolconda)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237607</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:57:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237605/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The soldiers in Afghanistan got new tanks, new mine resistant vehicles, new howitzers, new UAV's, new helicopters, new transport aircraft, even new rifles.As for the CFP and NFA projects -&nbsp; true, they stared under the Liberals, but that's mostly beca...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237605/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237605">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dave AAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237605</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:48:31 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237581/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237581</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ drunknsubmrnr wrote:Wonderful. Instead of getting new ships, the navy gets the "Royal" back. 

Talk about re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.....I have to agree with you there.&nbsp; What is it with Conservative governments in Canada - they claim t...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237581/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237581">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Admiral Beez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237581</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:34:27 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237575/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237575</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ When the British Army was formed in the 1660â€™s, it was a collection of regiments rather than a single unified force.&nbsp; Regiments were owned by contractors&nbsp;&nbsp; who expected to make a profit.&nbsp;&nbsp; Regiments were known by their Colonelâ€...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237575/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237575">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dave AAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237575</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:07:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237573/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ stanger69 wrote: 

A good move.An aside, why has there not been a Royal Army?Stanger,The answer is in the article itself:
quote:The army, which has many royal titles in its regiments, will be known as the Canadian Army.For example,&nbsp;our&nbsp;Army h...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237573/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237573">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (San Mao An)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237573</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:50:22 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237543/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF#reply-237543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A good move.

An aside, why has there not been a Royal Army? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (stanger69)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/reply/237543</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:13:58 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Canada to announce restoration of"Royal"to Navy and AF  ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17650/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Goodbye Marcom and Aircom?

This from the Halifax paper:

Quote
The Canadian military is returning to its roots.On Tuesday, National Defence Minister Peter Mackay is expected to announce the restoration of the Royal designation of the navy and air fo...<br /><a href="http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17650/Canada-to-announce-restoration-ofRoyalto-Navy-and-AF">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (San Mao An)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/17650</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:13:51 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
