<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Designing A Navy/Ship</title>
        <link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/forums/73</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ You know how to build a ship better then the designers, show it here. ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:07:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ A different type of commerce raider cruiser ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11903/t/A-different-type-of-commerce-raider-cruiser.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fast, well armored, and powerful enough to take on armed merchant ships.
<br>
<br>
KM Deutschland, Germany cruiser laid down 1929
<br>
<br>
Displacement:
<br>
    11,097 t light; 11,591 t standard; 13,965 t normal; 15,864 t full load
<br>
<br>
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
<br>
    634.50 ft / 630.00 ft x 63.20 ft x 22.00 ft (normal load)
<br>
    193.40 m / 192.02 m x 19.26 m  x 6.71 m
<br>
<br>
Armament:
<br>
      8 - 5.90&quot; / 150 mm guns in single mounts,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (desron)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11903</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:47:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Area Defense Frigate paper (131 pages pdf) ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11833/t/Area-Defense-Frigate-paper-131-pages-pdf-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~brown/VTShipDesign/2007ADFTeam5DraftReport.pdf">http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~br...7ADFTeam5DraftReport.pdf</a>
<br>
<br>
For those who have not seen this (it&#39;s my first time), this could prove an interesting read.... recalls DD-21 &amp; DDG-1000 material... It&#39;s a PDF of
131 pages...
<br>
<br>
<br>
For those into speed/resistance/powering, this may be of interest:
<br>
<br>
Chapter 7 Resistance and Powering of Ships
<br>
<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (daetaku)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11833</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ KM building programme - WW2 ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11803/t/KM-building-programme-WW2.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My opinion on the whole &quot;what the KM&quot; should have done leading up to WW2 is that it isn&#39;t entirely correct go with nothing but submarines. They
are your most important aspect, but they shouldn&#39;t be the only thing built. To keep the RN&#39;s reactive construction divided amongst priority, I say
build a pair of modern 16&quot; gunned battleships, displacing about 37,500 tons standard apiece, to form the core of a surface battlegroup. Cancel the
historical <em>Bismarck</em>,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11803</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Historical Ships ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11714/t/Historical-Ships.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I am trying to design the historical SMS Kaiser Fredrich III class pre dreadnought but I am running into some problems finding armor details. Conways and some
of the online sources I can find differ on the weaponry of the secondary battery.
<br>
<br>
More importantly I cannot find information on the upper belt nor do I really understand what the upper belt is. Can anyone explain to me what the upper belt is
and how one might figure out the thickness of the upper belt if all that is listed is... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flanyboy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11714</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ All-big gun semi-siblings to the Danton class ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11556/t/All-big-gun-semi-siblings-to-the-Danton-class.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This is easy ;-)
<br>
<br>
I think a lot of people consider France&#39;s Danton class to be one of the less-brilliant decisions by the staff of the French Navy.
<br>
<br>
So, the task is:
<br>
<br>
Design an all-big gun version of the Danton class, with displacement increased no more than 5%, with the same starting dates.
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11556</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 1938 Carrier AA Escort ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11554/t/1938-Carrier-AA-Escort.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A major navy is seeking designs for a carrier AA escort to be laid down in 1938. The intention is for one to two of these vessels will be assigned to each
carrier in the fleet to act as dedicated close support. The escort is intended to be optimized for escort duties and must be capable of staying with the
carrier for extended deployments. As such, the ship must have the speed and endurance to remain with the carrier and to defend it from the primary threat:
aircraft. Since these vessels will... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (charlesatlas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11554</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 2010 Perry FFG Replacement ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11522/t/2010-Perry-FFG-Replacement.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Blank slate. The USN is looking for a Perry class FFG replacement. ASW is primary role, secondary roles including anti-piracy/smuggling patrols, ASuW, and AAW
in at least a limited form. Other than that, it&#39;s pretty much freestyle, just try to keep it down to about half the displacement/cost of an Arleigh Burke
DDG. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11522</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Freestyle Battlecruiser Competition - 1918 ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11506/t/Freestyle-Battlecruiser-Competition-1918.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Goal: Design a battlecruiser for any nation, using that nation&#39;s respective weapons in service during that time period, while following the guidelines set
below;
<br>
<br>
 Armament:
<br>
 Note - Minimum of 6 Main guns per a design.
<br>
 For every 1 Main Gun, 2 Secondary Guns must be present. 
<br>
 For every 1 Main Gun and Secondary Gun, one light gun must be present.
<br>
 
<br>
 Armor:
<br>
 100% of Main Gun size be allocated to Conning Tower. (16&quot; Main gun = 16&quot; CT)
<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11506</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:29:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Designs Needed - 1943 ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11472/t/Designs-Needed-1943.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok, so here is the story. I&#39;m working on an alternate history story, in which old wrecks are brought up from the surface and rebuilt to an improved
version of their original form. For the purpose of these various ship designs, they will be using oil-fired boilers for the sims, although their actual
performance will be +3 knots because of a special type of energy and reactor used for the methods of propulsion. The ships that are to be rebuilt are as
follows:
<br>
<br>
 Scharnhorst and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11472</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Alt Hist:  Navy of the Pacific Federation ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11442/t/Alt-Hist-Navy-of-the-Pacific-Federation.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Navy of the Federation of the Pacific (NoP) has recently been authorized to order up to six cruisers, with an individual displacement not to exceed 10,000
tons, standard, and a total displacement not to exceed 44,000 tons, std, due to qualitative and quantitative limits under treaties to which the FotP is a
signatory.  These ships will be laid down in 1933.
<br>
<br>
Requirements:
<br>

<ul>
  <li>Main battery may be 8in (a new gun may be developed), or 175mm (while this is a bore... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11442</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:21:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Aegis Arrays & American Naval Architecture ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11380/t/Aegis-Arrays-American-Naval-Architecture.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Partialy a technical question and partialy the question - what the hell happened to US Naval Architecure<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/mad.gif" alt="image">.
<br>
<br>
Why are the SPY1 arrays on all in service vessels mounted below the level of the ships bridge?  Is it a matter of weight or available volume?  Does the radar
perform better when lower, which is contrary to the normal practice of mounting the radar as high as possible.
<br>
<br>
My question... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (John1964)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11380</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Argentina Treaty Cruiser - 1929 ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11372/t/Argentina-Treaty-Cruiser-1929.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This is more of a general competition than anything else, but the purpose of this competition is to design a full size Argentina Heavy Cruiser, Treaty Limits,
with 12x7.5&quot;/50 guns as main armament. This particular gun is a fictional development of the 7.5&quot;/45 Mk VI used in the RN Hawkins class, firing a
200lb shell like it&#39;s predecessor. This is an RN design, so secondaries and AA are to consist of 4x4.5&quot; DPs and 8x1.575&quot; minimum, no torpedoes
are to be embarked.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11372</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Another design a fleet... ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11363/t/Another-design-a-fleet-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In an alt hist I&#39;m playing with, Hawai&#39;i retains its independence.
<br>
<br>
Some demographic and economic points:
<br>

<ul>
  <li>Hawai&#39;i retains its monarchy.</li>

  <li>It has close ties with the two dominant remnants of the post-Civil War break up, the Federation of the Pacific (the US Pacific Coast states) and the
  American Union (essentially everything north of the Mason-Dixon line and east of the Mississippi plus Iowa and the states to its north)</li>

  <li>Population... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11363</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ HMS Invincible Question ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11313/t/HMS-Invincible-Question.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If <em>Invincible</em> had been built as a 9.2&quot;/50 gunned ship, while retaining the same displacement, how much additional armored protection could be
installed on the ship? Also, could the first two ship&#39;s entry into service be sped up if they are armed with the twin 9.2&quot;/50 mounts originally
intended for the <em>Lord Nelson</em> class? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Joshua Kintner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11313</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:37:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ WWII AA cruiser ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11174/t/WWII-AA-cruiser.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ American, follow up to the Atlanta class:
<br>
<br>
Between 6-8,000 tons
<br>
Length - no longer than 700 feet
<br>
Beam - no wider than 60 feet
<br>
Draft 20 feet
<br>
Speed 35+ knots
<br>
20x5inch guns
<br>
20-30mm AA cannons
<br>
No torpedoes ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NoOneFamous)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11174</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:59:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ First Generation all-big gun armored cruisers ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11134/t/First-Generation-all-big-gun-armored-cruisers.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The USN never completed a &quot;battle cruiser.&quot; 
<br>
<br>
The year is 1907;  the USN decides it needs a class (how many is up to you) of armored cruisers with homogeneous big-gun armament.
<br>
<br>
Main battery:  at least 8 guns, of at 10in or more bore.
<br>
Speed:            at least 20% faster than the RN&#39;s latest class of armored cruisers
<br>
Protection:       decent
<br>
<br>
Cost:   No more than <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">15% greater than the prior class... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (emc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11134</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 1884 Coast Defence Ship ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11128/t/1884-Coast-Defence-Ship.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU">Its 1884 and the colony of Victoria has just modernised
their ironclad Cerberus with nordenfelt guns in her tops to repel torpedo boats. Nevertheless, there is some concern as to her becoming obsolete in the next
five years.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"></p>

<p><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NewGolconda)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11128</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ LettersTime.  1932 Pacific Crisis ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11106/t/LettersTime-1932-Pacific-Crisis.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A continuation of the LettersTime Germany ship building program.
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
<br>
18 Sep 1931.
<br>
Japan invades the remainder of Chinese Manchuria.
<br>
The client state of Manchukuo is established. Like most other nations LettersTime Germany does not approve of this action and does not recognize Manchukuo as a
sovereign nation.
<br>
<br>
7 Jan 1932.
<br>
U.S. issues the Stimson Doctrine, opposing Japanese expansion in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dave Bender)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11106</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Help on enlarged Pocket Battleship design ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11099/t/Help-on-enlarged-Pocket-Battleship-design.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hello all,
<br>
<br>
    I&#39;m looking for a enlarged Pocket Battleship design laid down at around the same time as the Deutschland Class but displacing between 18000~20000 tons
standard and carry guns of 280~330mm in calibre. Below is my own design. Can people give suggestions and perhaps post their own designs given the restrictions
above?
<br>
<br>
<br>
Gascogne, France Pocket Battleship laid down 1930 (Engine 1931)
<br>
<br>
Displacement:
<br>
    18,703 t light; 19,604 t standard;... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (gaiasabre11)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11099</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:49:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Redesign the Perry class frigate ]]></title>
			<link>http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11069/t/Redesign-the-Perry-class-frigate.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The OHP was built with a 50 ton margin for future add ons while the standard at that time for a ship that size was about a 150 ton margin. Your task is to
replace whichever original weapon and radar systems the ship was equipped that you choose with other systems and show a wieght savings of approx. 100 tons.
<br>
<br>
 Extra credit for those who split the class into two types  (ASW platform and a ASuW type). Both to have self defense AAW capability.
<br>
<br>
Note: This isn&#39;t really a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (desron)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/11069</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>